fbpx
Ram
Trending

Does North America Need A Modern-Day Mid-Size Dakota Pickup?

Should The Dakota Nameplate Return?

As the full-size pickup market continues to grow in size and price, automakers in the United States are offering more choices than ever before in the mid-size pickup segment. Manufacturers like Chevrolet, GMC, Ford, Nissan, Honda, and Toyota, are about to be joined by new all-electric options like the Rivian R1T and Alpha Wolf. But where is the RAM brand? 

1989 Dodge Dakota LE Convertible. (Ram).

It wasn’t long ago, that the RAM brand (then Dodge Truck brand) played an important role in the segment by offering the first true mid-size pickup offering with the 1987 Dodge Dakota. The Dakota went on to become the first mid-size pickup to offer a V8 engine with the Shelby Dakota, the first mid-sized pickup to have a convertible option (that’s right Jeep®Gladiator fans), and the first mid-size pickup to offer a true four-door Crew Cab model. Dodge/Ram sold over 2.3 million units under the Dakota nameplate in the United States alone. So as the mid-size pickup segment continues a resurgence why not bring the Dakota nameplate back to the market?

2021 Ram 1500 Classic Express Black Quad Cab 4×4 (Left) and 2021 Ram 1500 Classic Black Express Crew Cab 4×4. (Ram).

Currently, the RAM brand offers its fourth-generation Ram 1500 under the Classic name, the full-sized Ram half-ton is priced similar to many mid-sized pickup offerings on the market. The aging Ram 1500 Classic models have all of their development and tooling costs well-paid off and with continued strong sales, the offering has become a “cash cow” for the brand. It has also allowed for RAM to continue to put the Classic sales under the Ram 1500 banner in its everlasting battle with Chevrolet for the second-place spot in the full-size truck segment.

1989 Dodge Dakota LE Convertible. (Ram).

Recently, we found out that RAM will indeed build a compact pickup exclusively to the brand for the Latin American market. This new unibody-based pickup will not be sold in markets north of the Rio Grande. Leaving Americans and Canadians, waiting for another option to be able to purchase.

Our friend, digital designer wb.artist20, has created his own design for a modern-day Dakota offering. Using the 2020 Ram 1500 Big Horn Crew Cab “Built To Serve” Edition as its base and using inspiration from the first-generation Dodge Dakota that ran from 1987 to 1990. The squared-off look of the original is present in this modern take. 

Ram Dakota Design. (wb.artist20).

Forget the need for a Crew Cab, wb.artist20 designed a Regular Cab with a long-box. The design includes a two-tone exterior paint scheme, which helps the Ram 1500 influenced body lines more prominent. There is even a hint of the famed “crosshair” grille with a modern take. We like the design and think it’s good to see a design not based on the beloved second-generation Dakota for a change.

It leads to the question, would you buy a modern-day mid-sized Dakota over a full-size Ram 1500? If so, what options would you want in a modern mid-size offering? If not, tell us why in the comments below or on the MoparInsiders.com forums. We would love to hear your thoughts on the idea of bringing a new Ram-based mid-sized pickup to the North American market!

Robert S. Miller

Robert S. Miller is a diehard Mopar enthusiast who lives and breathes all that is Mopar. The Michigander is not only the Editor for MoparInsiders.com, 5thGenRams.com, and HDRams.com but an automotive photographer. He is an avid fan of offshore powerboat racing, which he travels the country to take part in.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

I recently test drove a Ford Ranger. I drove it home to test fit it in my garage. I have a small work bench on my side.
The Ranger at a bit over 210" barely fit and I wouldn't be able to get past it without the garage door being open.
The Colorado, Canyon and Tacoma are a couple of inches longer than the Ranger.
The Frontier is just under 206" but I'm sure the new one will be longer than that.
The Maverick will be shorter than the Ranger but I lose rear wheel drive with it. Same with the Santa Cruz.
I would love to see a small to mid size rear wheel drive based Ram no longer than 206", 200 inches would be even better.
Not everyone needs or wants a big bed. The bed size of the Santa Cruz is what I would use. For the rare times I need more I have a utility trailer.
Plus by keeping the bed small in the Dakota it increase sales by being something different verus robbing sales from the full size Ram and Ram Classic.

Reply 3 Likes

click to expand...

I recently test drove a Ford Ranger. I drove it home to test fit it in my garage. I have a small work bench on my side.
The Ranger at a bit over 210" barely fit and I wouldn't be able to get past it without the garage door being open.
The Colorado, Canyon and Tacoma are a couple of inches longer than the Ranger.
The Frontier is just under 206" but I'm sure the new one will be longer than that.
The Maverick will be shorter than the Ranger but I lose rear wheel drive with it. Same with the Santa Cruz.
I would love to see a small to mid size rear wheel drive based Ram no longer than 206", 200 inches would be even better.
Not everyone needs or wants a big bed. The bed size of the Santa Cruz is what I would use. For the rare times I need more I have a utility trailer.
Plus by keeping the bed small in the Dakota it increase sales by being something different verus robbing sales from the full size Ram and Ram Classic.

Reply Like

click to expand...

With the upcoming SantaFe and Maverick, taking into consideration the industry's transition to electic and higher fuel prices (AGH), PCA/FCA would be wise to adapt to the US Market with such a vehicle as well as a Journey replacement. But I believe with the changing Biden Model (electrics), the pending national economic policy change will cause manufacturers to again 'off-shore' their models and manufacturing, the abrupt deep sixing of the expense incurrered FIAT chassis, PCA/FCA has too much on their plate for the time being.

Reply Like

It is hard not to make a knee jerk statement on this question, but it seems that this market exists and therefore a piece of that market is logical for Ram. Indeed it would seem that importing from Brazil a compact Ram version of a Fiat truck or better, two successful trucks would be an easy decision. Building a RWD mid-size Ram truck off the Jeep Gladiator would also be an easy decision. Most of the R and D work is done and all these new trucks have manufacturing facilities fully capable of building them on short notice. It boggles the mind why these decisions lament and anguish in the boardroom, but they do for some reason. Pardon my violent and uncontrolled knee jerk, BUT, what the heck is going on here to such an obvious answer to this softball question?

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

Anything built off the Gladiator is going to be expensive, but it won't be a toy. The Jeep Compass and Fiat Toro share the same platform and roll down the same production line together in Brazil. The same thing could be done in Toluca for the Ram version of the Toro.

Unless the Ford Maverick comes in at a reasonable price with a decent power/ fuel economy balance, it will be a flash in the pan. The 3 cylinder Bronco Sports in our fleet have a hard time bettering the fuel economy of the Chrysler minivans we have.

Reply Like

Back to top button