fbpx
ChryslerDodgeOpinion
Trending

Rhodes Issues A “Code Red” For Chrysler And Dodge In Fortune

Rhodes Advocates For Tim Kuniskis As The Leader To Revive Chrysler And Dodge...

In a recent Fortune article by Frank B. Rhodes Jr., the great-grandson of Chrysler founder Walter P. Chrysler, he raises urgent concerns about the future of the Chrysler and Dodge brands under Stellantis’ management. Rhodes, an unofficial advocate for Chrysler, outlines key steps needed to save these iconic American automotive brands from decline, especially as Stellantis pushes them toward an all-electric future.

Challenges Facing Chrysler and Dodge –

Frank Rhodes, Jr. with his 1926 Chrysler E80 and his Great-Grandfather toolbox.

Rhodes highlights Stellantis’ heavy focus on electric vehicles (EVs) for both Chrysler and Dodge as a major concern. While Stellantis is committed to transforming its lineup to focus on clean mobility, Rhodes believes this push for full electrification is premature. He emphasizes that many other automakers are opting for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) to address slower growth in EV adoption due to high costs, limited charging infrastructure, and inconvenience. “Chrysler did release a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) version of the Pacifica minivan, but it seems steadfast in its pursuit of an all-electric future, a strategy that could spell doom for the brand,” says Rhodes.

According to Rhodes, the real problem lies in Chrysler’s stagnant lineup. The brand hasn’t launched a new vehicle since the 2017 Chrysler Pacifica, leaving it struggling to stay competitive. Promising concept vehicles like the Chrysler Airflow were shown but never brought to production, leading to missed opportunities. As Rhodes puts it, “Chrysler was once known as an innovator and an engineering powerhouse, but in the past two decades, it has become a company that follows trends rather than sets them.”

The Dodge Brand’s Dilemma –

2024 Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack Stage 2 First Edition.

While Dodge has been somewhat more active than Chrysler, Rhodes still sees problems in Stellantis’ approach. The Dodge brand is offering both internal combustion engine (ICE) and electric versions of its new models, but Rhodes warns that pushing too quickly into electric could alienate its core customer base. “Dodge’s buyers have traditionally been enthusiasts of American muscle and performance… the push to transition too quickly risks alienating loyal customers,” Rhodes explains.

Dodge has built a strong identity around muscle cars and performance, but its reliance on electric models may not align with what many of its American fans want. Rhodes suggests that Dodge should diversify its lineup by offering smaller, more affordable performance vehicles with turbocharged engines. He also proposes building the Dodge Hornet in North America to lower costs and attract new buyers.

Criticism of Stellantis Leadership –

Stellantis CEO, Carlos Tavares and the Chrysler Airflow. 

Rhodes also takes issue with Stellantis’ management and priorities, particularly CEO Carlos Tavares. He suggests that Stellantis is overly focused on cost-cutting and outsourcing, which has resulted in poor factory conditions, stagnant sales, and outdated products in dealerships. Rhodes notes that American buyers want vehicles designed and built in the U.S., but Stellantis’ reliance on outsourcing has hurt the quality and appeal of Chrysler and Dodge in their home market. “Stellantis continues to push overpriced products into a high-interest-rate market, with questionable build quality stemming from its outsourcing practices,” Rhodes criticizes.

The Path Forward for Chrysler and Dodge –

Chrysler Airflow Graphite Concept.

In Rhodes’ opinion, the brands need leadership that understands the American automotive market and the passion of car enthusiasts. He suggests that Tim Kuniskis, the recently retired CEO of Dodge and Ram, could be the ideal person to lead the revival of these brands—provided Stellantis gives him the freedom to operate without corporate constraints. “Stellantis needs leadership that understands the American automotive market from a car enthusiast’s perspective—someone who can build on the legacy of Chrysler and Dodge and develop vehicles that speak to what customers here really want,” Rhodes states.

Rhodes’ article shines a light on the growing frustration among American fans of Chrysler and Dodge. Despite Stellantis’ insistence that all 14 of its brands have a decade to succeed, Rhodes and many loyal customers are concerned that without immediate action, Chrysler and Dodge may lose their place in the American automotive landscape.

Source: Fortune

Robert S. Miller

Robert S. Miller is a diehard Mopar enthusiast who lives and breathes all that is Mopar. The Michigander is not only the Editor for MoparInsiders.com, 5thGenRams.com, and HDRams.com but an automotive photographer. He is an avid fan of offshore powerboat racing, which he travels the country to take part in.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

Where are the MAX Wedge & Mini MAX V8s? I've had Mercedes, Audi, Ford twin turbo vehicles and they all Suck so no comments about the Hurricane. A high compression V8 is far superior to a little 6 cyl with low comp and boost for instant power, no contest.

The Pacifica is the only Chrysler vehicle to have real design time in the last 20 years. CDJR: The N.A. V8s haven't had any technology updates in over 15 years. I've been a Mechanical Design Engineer for 25 years and have seen very few in upper management that can lead well. Stellantis & UAW leadership are typical modern jokes of an organization. Gutting companies, massive bonuses, and nothing being developed. The FCA Italy, Fat Cats, & BEVs got all the money and nothing to show for it now.

Reply 11 Likes

click to expand...

This is a fantastic letter.

What are the next steps? How do we get involved and help?

Reply 14 Likes

I hope and pray you are successful. Been a diehard Mopar guy since the late seventies, but my last purchase (2024) was a GM product. Stellantis has aggravated me no end and the current product is lacking, while the prices have become absurd. They still have no clue when it comes to the American market. Ignorant bastards !

Reply 10 Likes

This is a fantastic letter.

What are the next steps? How do we get involved and help?

I would like to help as well

Reply 2 Likes

If the Chrysler brand is in immediate need of new product (it is) you could start by taking the existing Jeep Wagoneer, give it some flash and sizzle, and then rebadge it as the new Imperial. Then set its base price below Escalade and Navigator to both generate interest and make it a good value proposition. The (currently overpriced) premium Jeep Grand Wagoneer is more a GMC Yukon Denali rival and should be treated as such. (As a side note, the regular Wagoneer's inflated base MSRP should also be more in line with Tahoe/Expedition).

As for the now defunct 300 the only way I'd greenlight a new model based on the upcoming 2025 Charger is if it had suicide doors standard. Sure they'd be a gimmick, but with car sales currently moribund the only way a product in this dying segment could have realistic shot at success is if its design were truly out-of-the-box unique. For the cherry on top make its base price below 50k, making it into a true poor man's Rolls Royce. (Only stumbling block I can see design wise for suicide doors is that you need to have seems between the doors and rear fenders that are virtually straight for them to function (look at current Rolls Royces and previous Continentals for reference). That would probably necessitate a wheelbase stretch, costing time and money.

In the early 2000s Chrysler was very successful at being a purveyor of unique vehicles with products like the PT Cruiser and 300 and they should consider returning to that formula.

Reply 4 Likes

click to expand...

Back to top button