Deckard Cain
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2018
- Messages
- 702
- Reaction score
- 539
- Points
- 93
At least a redesign of the C pillar would contribute to make the models look different enough.
It should've gotten a Dodge steering wheel and the rear pillar should've been redesigned. I don't think those two small details would've cost much, but then it wouldn't be so similar to the Tonale and it wouldn't cannibalize its sales in the US as I am sure that was the intent from Manley and Kuniskis.My first view of the Hornet was the light blue media image posted on IG. I was not impressed with it from that view if I'm honest. Having now seen more images of it, I'm starting to like it.
I'm disappointed by the rear pillar and rear door design, and that there isn't rear racetrack tail lights if I'm honest. The interior has had some adjustments, but I don't like the Alfa steering wheel, the volume roller, or the engine start/stop button.
Having said that, I do like the front, although some angles look too "meek" for a Dodge, IMO. I like the hood, and the lighting. I like the changes inside vs. the Alfa interior. Want to see one in person, and drive a GT and R/T to fully see what these are like tho.
Is it better than a Journey? YesAm I glad Dodge is getting new product? Absolutely!
Do I like it? No, it is not for me.
Is it better than a Journey? Yes
Is it good for the Segment? Yes
That’s needlessly defensive over a vehicle you weren’t personally involved in the development of. Someone waiting for new product from Dodge has a right to be disappointed that the first new product isn’t from a segment they’re shopping in.Shame on Dodge for not making every vehicle for you ??? ......
It funny how people expect every vehicle from there favorite brand to somehow cater to them or it falls short. I take one of each? Sort of funny. Compact CUV is a nessary segment for any healthy brand. This has the Chops to wear Dodge. I just wish Pepe hadn't shelved the exotic components from the Tonale to set it apart from the Hornet.
Not needlessly defending anything. I suppose, be disappointed is fine, announcing it to the world????. I been waiting for a Dodge Stelvio for 4 years, but am happy anytime the brand gets something new. I don't feel the need to point out it not for me. I am not in the market for a Small SUV but am happy that those who are now have a option.That’s needlessly defensive over a vehicle you weren’t personally involved in the development of. Someone waiting for new product from Dodge has a right to be disappointed that the first new product isn’t from a segment they’re shopping in.
Alfa is complaining about the Hornet as it is now. Maybe saving the exotic material and component for the Tonale.Shame on Dodge for not making every vehicle for you ??? ......
It funny how people expect every vehicle from there favorite brand to somehow cater to them or it falls short. I take one of each? Sort of funny. Compact CUV is a nessary segment for any healthy brand. This has the Chops to wear Dodge. I just wish Pepe hadn't shelved the exotic components from the Tonale to set it apart from the Hornet.
Where are the light components? Looks to me like cost cutting means the Tonale got the cheaper and heavier components meant for the Dodge and the Tonale is left with a fairly typical offering instead of something unique in the class. Slower by a second than the Stelvio with essentially the same drivetrain.Alfa is complaining about the Hornet as it is now. Maybe saving the exotic material and component for the Tonale.
Everyone keeps saying that NA got a Hornet twin. Based on what I knew at the supplier launch, its the other way around Alfa got the Hornet twin. There is a BIG difference.Tonale didn't get the love in an amount which was planned under late Sergio.
It would always be Small Wide based product but heavily revised and of course with more powerful ICE engines.
We got sort of a half baked car.