fbpx
ChryslerDodgeMoparPlymouthYouTube
Trending

Rhodes Jr. Talks Chrysler & Dodge After Stellantis Statement

Discusses His Vision For The Iconic Brands, After Stellantis Response...

In an unexpected turn of events, Frank B. Rhodes, Jr., great-grandson of Walter P. Chrysler, appeared on a late-night livestream with RacerX on Friday to discuss his proposal to acquire the Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth, and Mopar brands from Stellantis. This came just hours after Stellantis issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to its entire portfolio of brands and making it clear that it has no plans to sell any of its American brands.

Earlier in the week, Rhodes made headlines when he revealed his intention to place a bid for the iconic American brands. This move came on the heels of comments made by Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares, who had previously stated that the company would consider shutting down or selling off brands that were not profitable. “If they don’t make money, we’ll shut them down,” Tavares had said, emphasizing the importance of financial performance for each of Stellantis’ 14 brands.

However, Stellantis was quick to dismiss any notions of a sale, issuing a statement that read, “Stellantis acknowledges the interest in its North American brands and reaffirms the Company’s commitment to its entire portfolio of 14 powerful, iconic brands, which were each given a 10-year timeframe to build a profitable and sustainable business. Like the Jeep® and Ram brands, Chrysler and Dodge are at the forefront of Stellantis’ transformation to clean mobility, benefitting from the Group’s cutting-edge technology and scale. The Company is not pursuing splitting off any of its brands.”

Rhodes responded to the Stellantis statement with disappointment, particularly regarding the way the communication was handled. In a statement to the media, he said, “I was greatly disappointed to learn that Stellantis issued some kind of response to my proposal. Since I sent the proposal to Carlos Tavares and Christine Feuell, I expected the courtesy of their reply to come directly to me. Instead, I have learned about their comments from my media friends. I hope that in the future, we will have direct communications, or at least copied.”

During the hour-long livestream with RacerX, Rhodes elaborated on his vision for the Chrysler and Dodge brands. He expressed his unwavering commitment to preserving the legacy of the brands that his great-grandfather helped create nearly a century ago. Rhodes emphasized that he has not given up on his proposal and remains dedicated to ensuring the future success of these storied brands.

The livestream offered viewers a deeper insight into Rhodes’ passion for the American automotive industry and his determination to see Chrysler and Dodge thrive once again. While Stellantis has made it clear that it is not looking to sell any of its brands, Rhodes’ persistence in his mission to save these iconic American brands.

Robert S. Miller

Robert S. Miller is a diehard Mopar enthusiast who lives and breathes all that is Mopar. The Michigander is not only the Editor for MoparInsiders.com, 5thGenRams.com, and HDRams.com but an automotive photographer. He is an avid fan of offshore powerboat racing, which he travels the country to take part in.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

Where are the MAX Wedge & Mini MAX V8s? I've had Mercedes, Audi, Ford twin turbo vehicles and they all Suck so no comments about the Hurricane. A high compression V8 is far superior to a little 6 cyl with low comp and boost for instant power, no contest.

The Pacifica is the only Chrysler vehicle to have real design time in the last 20 years. CDJR: The N.A. V8s haven't had any technology updates in over 15 years. I've been a Mechanical Design Engineer for 25 years and have seen very few in upper management that can lead well. Stellantis & UAW leadership are typical modern jokes of an organization. Gutting companies, massive bonuses, and nothing being developed. The FCA Italy, Fat Cats, & BEVs got all the money and nothing to show for it now.

Reply 11 Likes

click to expand...

This is a fantastic letter.

What are the next steps? How do we get involved and help?

Reply 14 Likes

I hope and pray you are successful. Been a diehard Mopar guy since the late seventies, but my last purchase (2024) was a GM product. Stellantis has aggravated me no end and the current product is lacking, while the prices have become absurd. They still have no clue when it comes to the American market. Ignorant bastards !

Reply 10 Likes

This is a fantastic letter.

What are the next steps? How do we get involved and help?

I would like to help as well

Reply 2 Likes

If the Chrysler brand is in immediate need of new product (it is) you could start by taking the existing Jeep Wagoneer, give it some flash and sizzle, and then rebadge it as the new Imperial. Then set its base price below Escalade and Navigator to both generate interest and make it a good value proposition. The (currently overpriced) premium Jeep Grand Wagoneer is more a GMC Yukon Denali rival and should be treated as such. (As a side note, the regular Wagoneer's inflated base MSRP should also be more in line with Tahoe/Expedition).

As for the now defunct 300 the only way I'd greenlight a new model based on the upcoming 2025 Charger is if it had suicide doors standard. Sure they'd be a gimmick, but with car sales currently moribund the only way a product in this dying segment could have realistic shot at success is if its design were truly out-of-the-box unique. For the cherry on top make its base price below 50k, making it into a true poor man's Rolls Royce. (Only stumbling block I can see design wise for suicide doors is that you need to have seems between the doors and rear fenders that are virtually straight for them to function (look at current Rolls Royces and previous Continentals for reference). That would probably necessitate a wheelbase stretch, costing time and money.

In the early 2000s Chrysler was very successful at being a purveyor of unique vehicles with products like the PT Cruiser and 300 and they should consider returning to that formula.

Reply 4 Likes

click to expand...

Back to top button