What's new
By:
Mopar Insiders Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Meet The All-New Three-Row 2021 Jeep® Grand Cherokee L:

Meet The All-New Three-Row 2021 Jeep® Grand Cherokee L:​

The Fifth-Generation Grand Cherokee Is Here!​


1610386888092.png

Meet The All-New Three-Row 2021 Jeep® Grand Cherokee L:

It was 29 years ago today, that the Jeep® brand shook up the SUV segment with the introduction of the 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ). Originally intended to be a replacement for the legendary Jeep Grand Wagoneer (SJ), the all-new ZJ was introduced to the media at the North American International...
moparinsiders.com moparinsiders.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
One particular trim level looks Sporty to me. But @Ryan doesn't like it.
 
Bili said:
One particular trim level looks Sporty to me. But @Ryan doesn't like it.
Click to expand...
It’s not the worst thing in the world, but the WL Altitude doesn’t look as premium as a WK2 Altitude because black plastic can be cheap or rugged, but not sporty or premium. The Altitude was the trim level I wanted specifically to avoid black plastic and get black accents from the factory. My WK2 Limited has black plastic and that’s significantly harder to maintain than a painted surface.

Looks like they’re taking a page from the Cherokee playbook and making you step up to High Altitude to get body-color trim. Especially since all trim levels but the Overland have the Summit fascia now—a welcome surprise.
 
TripleT said:
You wouldn't want to be linked to best handling SUV in the world.... REALLY??? maybe not the electronic glitchiness that comes with a semi-exotic. Think maybe your inserting some personal bias in that one?

I pretty sure @Bili you will find the Stelvio build points are inbound of the WL, thing the definitions do matter to an Engineer. The design for sure has it roots and well it should from one of the best handling vehicles for sale, with Jeeps extensive knowledge of off road durability. At some point is like 2 set of Grand Parents arguing who the grand children look more like.... when the answer is neither and both. In the end the beauty of the FCA development process is you come up with something that is perfectly suited to the application.
Click to expand...
I have no bias against fiat or alpha - false assumption on your part. Many, many people seem to though unfortunately so it appears you at least partially agreed with the premise of my comment. The other reason marketing doesn't want them linked in my opinion would be the different markets the brands target. Didn't think i'd have to explain that in text.
 
Rustydodge said:
I have no bias against fiat or alpha - false assumption on your part. Many, many people seem to though unfortunately so it appears you at least partially agreed with the premise of my comment. The other reason marketing doesn't want them linked in my opinion would be the different markets the brands target. Didn't think i'd have to explain that in text.
Click to expand...

Who is Alpha the dog from the kids movie? Of course I didn't mean you as you .... but you as in one. Ones own, other bias.

I do not think Alfa has enough visibility in NA, for the consumer to have a negative or positive bias.... But from a marketing perspective linking it to "best handling SUV" in the world is positive.
 
Ryan said:
I wonder if this will become a trend on the higher end Jeeps, replacing Trailhawk with a more premium off-road model.
Click to expand...
Which totally falls into the (FCA/Stellantis) North American direction of getting dealers to inventory/ getting customers to absorb richer price models (trim/features/special packages/equipment,etc).
In return, higher EBIT margins.
 
TripleT said:
Who is Alpha the dog from the kids movie? Of course I didn't mean you as you .... but you as in one. Ones own, other bias.

I do not think Alfa has enough visibility in NA, for the consumer to have a negative or positive bias.... But from a marketing perspective linking it to "best handling SUV" in the world is positive.
Click to expand...

Which would be correct if people actually have driven one, to know they are the best handling. Again, my comments were in regards to average american, and marketing. Avg person doesnt follow auto publications or knows that Stelvo handles so well. They probably don't know that vehicle even exists. All they would hear/see is some "platform" they've never heard of, a name they wouldn't know how to pronounce, and a foreign sounding brand LOL. Jeep probably doesn't want to link them by perception or otherwise

For example - it is implied in this article, that Jeep executives refuse to imply they are even related at all:
www.motortrend.com

2021 Jeep Grand Cherokee L Apparently Not a Threat to Dodge Durango, Jeep Wagoneer Sales

Executives don't think the Jeep will cannibalize sales from other three-row FCA/Stellantis SUVs.
www.motortrend.com www.motortrend.com
 
The Dodge Grand Caravan aged well until the Chrysler Pacifica was introduced. After driving the Pacifica, the Dodge minivan just suddenly showed its age. I suspect a similar thing will happen when the the new Jeep Grand Cherokee L is introduced. I like the Dodge Durango, but I am surprised by how broad the model trim and option availability list is for the 3-row Grand Cherokee. But I don't need a 3-row vehicle and have become very curious what the traditional 2-row Jeep GC model will have in store.
 
patfromigh said:
The Dodge Grand Caravan aged well until the Chrysler Pacifica was introduced. After driving the Pacifica, the Dodge minivan just suddenly showed its age. I suspect a similar thing will happen when the the new Jeep Grand Cherokee L is introduced. I like the Dodge Durango, but I am surprised by how broad the model trim and option availability list is for the 3-row Grand Cherokee. But I don't need a 3-row vehicle and have become very curious what the traditional 2-row Jeep GC model will have in store.
Click to expand...

So we moved from Citadel to Stelvio.... your right. when first driving the Durango I was astounded by it driving dynamics for the size. Now I am like, it was ok.

We will see how much carries over, someone who driven it said it "Really Nice"
 
Wasn't the plan to bring Trailhawk, Streethawk, Sandhawk models?
 
Are we sure the L should get a TrailHawk version??? Because I am not.
 
TripleT said:
Are we sure the L should get a TrailHawk version??? Because I am not.
Click to expand...

If it's Trail Rated, I see no issue with it.

But if it hadn't been able to be Trail Rated, then I would agree.
 
UN4GTBL said:
If it's Trail Rated, I see no issue with it.

But if it hadn't been able to be Trail Rated, then I would agree.
Click to expand...

But the Trailhawk is suppose to be beyond Trial Rated?..... if not just a Appearance Package? If can be either if it is just appearance then have at it. But we know on the Cherokee, Compass, and Renegade it is more than Appearance. And while front and rear clips, and taller springs will all move the WL75 better... the break over cannot be changed beyond the max lift in the air suspension variants.
 
TripleT said:
But the Trailhawk is suppose to be beyond Trial Rated?..... if not just a Appearance Package? If can be either if it is just appearance then have at it. But we know on the Cherokee, Compass, and Renegade it is more than Appearance. And while front and rear clips, and taller springs will all move the WL75 better... the break over cannot be changed beyond the max lift in the air suspension variants.
Click to expand...
Trailhawk does not go beyond Trail Rated capability.

I responded here.
 
I responded there.... it is more even in the Grand Cherokee which all models are trail rated the Trailhawk is more capable and has more ground clearance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top