I think it's interesting that you are creating such high standards for a potential Stellatins Giulietta. The previous Giulietta never had anything that came even close to the BMW M1, Mercedes A 45 AMG or Audi RS3. So you ARE moving goal posts. That wasn't an issue for not having a Giulietta previously and it should not be an issue now.
And for me PHEV is a perfect compromise for that solution because, while it might make a vehicle heavier, it's also a way of having better weight distribution and a lower center of gravity. Will it compete with the best? No. Will it be enough in a first generation Stellatins Giulietta? Yes.
To me, I prefer a billion times a nicely styled Giulietta in a "compromised" platform than an absence of the C-segment hatch segment in Europe.
Hell, that's all Fiat did with Alfa since they acquired them anyway, so don't preach me with purisms nowadays. Tell me about the super-sporty 147 version that left the germans in the dust. Tell me about the Alfa 159 that wasn't an overweight FWD pig with lipstick that was dynamically superior to the germans. Tell me about the 156 that was competitive with the mythical E46 M3. Tell me about the Alfa GT, which topped out at a 240hp V6 and had the same interior as the 147 (big LOL).
So don't come and preach me about purity, and that an Alfa Giulietta has to have as good technical solutions as the german competitors. It. Does. Not.
They haven't done that for decades. They will take a lot longer to be able to do that in all segments. And to do that they need to have comercially competitive options that will then show the bean counters that a sporty version might make sense. They shouldn't stop competing in volume segments just because they cannot offer niche halo versions in those segments. That's just dumb strategically.
Let's start this with one video:
So they have 2.0 330 HP. They just need to fit it into a platform which has transversely oriented engine. Suitable transmission would be harder to find. But Stellantis is now a quite big company. They should come out with something.
And the engine I've mentioned is not a performance version so they can puh it a little bit of they want.
As I said Alfa doesn't need to have the most powerful engine in the class. It should be reasonably powerful but handling and drive feeling should be top notch. That's something which was spot on for 156 and 147 generation.
PHEV would not give nimble handling or good felling. There are other PSA brands which could and should utilize PHEV tech for performance versions.
Giulietta? At the time it was benchmarked against Golf Mk VI. Golf GTI to be precise. That't a Golf version which is oriented for handling. R is not handling oriented, not as GTI.
156 against E46? 156 beat it at ETCC. Production based racing. 156 had excellent bones for FWD based car. No doubt about it.
Alfa is and must be about handling, about driving experience, about driver at the center.
Very true. And nowadays it's much more important for sales to have electrified versions and super infotainment than superb power or handling. As Giulia and Stelvio sadly show.
I'm a bit worried for Tonale that it might get stranded as the last product on an abandoned platform. With unprofitable production all on its own. Lacking further updates in the future. No infos yet for new Renegade/500X generations, right? Apart from the 500X/L merge.
Giulia and Stelvio sales? It's at this level due to various reasons. A lot is related to sales network. More than some may imagine.
500X and 500L merge? Not true. Not even close. I can say as much. A lot is under development, a lot is green lit. I'm talking about FCA in general.
You don't wanna tell us that the Alfa Cassino output was intended to go under 60k yearly? The sales goals for Giulia and Stelvio were higher, and so were the initial sales. Of course Alfa Romeo is no mass-market brand like Toyota, but it's not the next Bugatti either. Alfa needs a bit higher sales to stay visible and deliver enough traffic to keep dealers/garages going. European Giulia sales per year went from 24,500 to 7,500, Stelvio from 30,000 to 17,500 …
Combined output for Giulia and Stelvio was around 135k for 5 days working week.
Exactly. Those are the halo models. A C-segment benefits from those and builds up volume.
Giulia and Stelvio as halo models?
Please back that up with data. From what I can see, the premium share of the segment went up in the last decade.
Premium C-segment?
As I've said sales are much more complicated. Retail vs fleet. Home market, how big it is, do they buy domestic or foreign cars. To be sincere I must say that a lot of this is playing against Alfa Romeo. Their goal from the start were retail sales. Now they've got new CEO who was the main responsible for PSA retail sales. The guy who had brought PSA to the record breaking EBIT margins because of his retail sales success. FYI, PSA has lower margin for fleet sales than FCA. At least it was like that in 2018 or first half od 2019. Manley once mentioned it.