Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
14:1 is static and not dynamic which is effectively much less since there is deliberate intake reversion which lowers power density (low power output per CI). Typically only used with hybrid powertrains and not in performance vehicles. Also, it's on a much smaller piston diameter which allows...
This is CDJR's M.O.: Release a decent new technology on the GC & Wrangler, then over the next 5-8 years, release the same tech onto sister vehicles.
How about a real Reveal like a MAX Wedge V8 with a much more efficient chamber than the Hemi, add direct injection with 12:1 compression, an...
Zero development for 15 years on:
Durango, Challenger, Charger, 300 chassis and bot 5.7 & 6.4 NA Hemis. Everything was live for the moment supercharged Hemis and sending money to Italy. Only new trim packages for the US and spreading technology from top end models across other productlines...
Some if us are engineers and have been MOPAR fans for 40+ years but the people running CDJR are following the crowd without even trying to be innovative. Mercedes helped develop and release the Hemi, then 5 years later, an upgraded 5.7 with even better heads, cam phaser, and active intake. No...
What people like you aren't getting is, we understand regulations and see a total lack of effort that CDJR has put into a pushrod V8. Nothing since 2009 while GM has released many iterations of theirs.
OHV engines can have compound valve angles and a wedge chamber that an OHC cannot match...
Too many ignorant, simple minds like yours on this site. CDJR has put Zero, again 0 effort into a new Hemi (Semi Hemi) V8 design since 2009...that is the problem. Incompetence at the top, Period. If you follow racing, you'd see some amazing development in OHV engines that have compound valve...
Why don't you go home where it's safe and leave the discussion to the adults with some knowledge. You're comparing a 2009 5.7 OHV Hemi with a 2009 5.0 DOHC. They're both out of date and a OHV motor will get better fuel economy than the DOHC engine because N.A. engines like a wedge shape...
It's not a bold move, rather your only move to drop the Hemi when you're incompetent. The valve angles should have been straightened up from 16° intake to 10-12°, then rotated 15° to fit an injector into a chamber closer to a wedge than Hemi. The a single plug down from the tip. It would be...
FCA should have branded all of the ALFAs under the Chrysler name and not had separate delearships. Money should have been put into two new Hemis one being a baby Hemi to use the smaller 8 speed. No vision and no drive in upper management.
There definitely is a way but not when you wait 15 years and try to catch up. All upper management at FCA was on a short sighted plan and no vision. It's caught up with them and they blame the EPA.
No development since 2009 is the reason. The valve arrangement could be twisted, canted, quenched, and DI added. A DOHC chamber is not far from the Hemi design which Chevy, Mercedes and Ford are promoting their V8s.
MotorMaven, Why are you such an apologist for lazy, short sited management...
To bad FCA didn't put that $1.675 Billion into engine development. All the gas guzzler tax paid by owners of the Hellcats into developing better fuel economy. A bunch of slackers.
No technology improvements since 2009 on the Normally Aspirated Hemis...is anyone really surprised?
Upper management is a major disappointment, so many wasted years Tim Kuniskis is a short sighted opportunist...Way to run the Hemi into extinction Tim! Ford, GM, & Mercedes have big plans for...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.