News
Trending

Carlos Tavares Warns Stellantis Could Split Apart In The Future

Former CEO Says Tensions Between France, Italy, and the U.S. Could Push Break Up

Ten months after being ousted from Stellantis, former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Carlos Tavares is sounding alarms about the company’s long-term future. In a new book published in France this week, Tavares warns that the multinational automaker he helped form could eventually be broken apart if growing political and cultural tensions within the organization continue to escalate.

Tavares wrote that Stellantis’ balance between its three main regions — France, Italy, and the United States — has become increasingly unstable. “I am worried that the three-way balance between Italy, France, and the U.S. will break,” he said in the book. “The group’s survival as a standalone company will depend on management paying attention to unity every day.”

The Promise and Strain of a Global Merger –

Carlos Tavares, then CEO of PSA (left) and Mike Manley, then CEO of FCA. (Stellantis).

Formed in 2021 through the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) and France’s PSA Group, Stellantis was touted as a global automotive powerhouse. Its portfolio spans 14 brands — from Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep®, Ram  in North America to Fiat, Peugeot, Citroën, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati in Europe. The merger was intended to pool resources, technology, and market reach across continents, creating a single entity capable of competing with giants like Toyota and Volkswagen.

However, Tavares argues that the balance that once defined Stellantis is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain. France prioritizes industrial jobs and national identity. Italy demands investment in local manufacturing. The United States — home to Stellantis’ most profitable operations — is focused on trucks, SUVs, and financial returns. Each of these priorities, he says, pulls the automaker in a different direction.

“The strength of Stellantis comes from its diversity,” Tavares wrote, “but that same diversity can also become a weakness if unity is not protected every single day.”

The End of an Era –

Former Stellantis CEO, Carlos Tavares and French President Emmanuel Macron at the Paris Motor Show. (Stellantis).

The 67-year-old “stepped down” in December following steep market share declines in both Europe and the United States. His leadership style, defined by aggressive cost-cutting and strict efficiency measures, divided opinion. Under his watch, Stellantis relocated production and engineering work to lower-cost countries like Morocco — moves that boosted short-term profitability but angered unions and politicians across Europe.

Labor groups in Italy and France accused Tavares of hollowing out local industry, while employees criticized his push for remote work and reduced staff levels. Several high-ranking executives left during his tenure, with some even joining Chinese automaker BYD, which is now expanding rapidly in Europe.

Tavares maintains that his decisions were made in the best interest of long-term survival. “With me gone, I am not sure that the French interests that I always had at heart — whether you believe it or not — will be as well defended,” he wrote.

A New Chapter Under Filosa –

Antonio Filosa, then COO of Stellantis South America (left) and Carlos Tavares, then CEO of Stellantis (right). (Stellantis).

In June, Stellantis appointed Antonio Filosa as its new CEO after a months-long search. A veteran of the former Fiat Chrysler organization and a seasoned executive with Jeep® in South America, Filosa has quickly made his mark. Described by Tavares as a “logical and rational” successor, Filosa has redirected Stellantis’ focus toward its strongest markets.

He recently pledged to invest $13 billion in U.S. operations — a move aimed at strengthening Stellantis’ American presence but one that has sparked concern among European unions and government officials. Many of Filosa’s senior leadership picks have come from the former FCA side of the company, further shifting the corporate balance toward North America and Latin America.

Meanwhile, Stellantis has temporarily idled several European plants this month due to weak demand and overcapacity, prompting renewed fears of deep production cuts.

Could Stellantis Split Apart? –

Former WTAP Manager Andy Ragalyi (left) with Carlos Tavares (center) during a tour of the facility in 2021. (Stellantis).

Tavares’ most striking prediction is that the company could eventually fracture. “One possible scenario, and there are many others, could be a Chinese manufacturer one day making a bid for the Europe business, with the Americans taking back the North America operations,” he wrote. “This would allow each to refocus on their own markets, much like General Motors (GM) has done over the past 10 years.

His warning comes at a time of growing political and economic tension. Last year, U.S. Senator Bernie Moreno called on Stellantis to divest its American brands — Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep®, and Ram — claiming they should “return to American hands.” At the same time, new tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump’s administration are disrupting supply chains and forcing automakers to rethink global manufacturing strategies.

The Road Ahead –

Former Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares. (Stellantis).

As Stellantis faces rising competition from Chinese EV makers, stricter emissions targets in Europe, and ongoing political friction across its home markets, the company’s multinational structure may soon be tested like never before.

For Tavares, the lesson is clear — global unity is fragile, and Stellantis’ future depends on it. “The company can survive,” he wrote, “but only if its leadership understands that balance is not a given — it must be earned every day.”

However, after speaking with several people within Stellantis in recent months, it appears that internal morale and overall outlook have improved noticeably since Tavares’ departure.

Source: Bloomberg

Robert S. Miller

Robert S. Miller is a diehard Mopar enthusiast who lives and breathes all that is Mopar. The Michigander is not only the Editor for MoparInsiders.com, 5thGenRams.com, and HDRams.com but an automotive photographer. He is an avid fan of offshore powerboat racing, which he travels the country to take part in.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

How about Jeep. Chrysler, Dodge, Ram, Fiat, Alfa, and Maserati ... split from the other brands Focus on Italy, NA, and SA ..... Maybe call it FCA and have it run by Car people instead penny pinching accountants.

Reply 2 likes

If they are to split, CDJR should be the ones to reform under another banner from the EURO brands. Chrysler and Dodge are specific to the Americas, while RAM and Jeep have branched out to the global market. Americans will not give up their V8s for all this electrification nonsense, but they will compromise with mild/full hybrid models.

Give Dodge and Chrysler truly defined roles in the company. Dodge has has always been mainstream with sportiness in the same vein as Chevy and Ford, so it should remain while adding new models. Chrysler has been that slight step up like Buick, but it can be remodeled easily given that it only has one model (Voyager doesn't count as a second). If they had a real CEO for Chrysler, it would have been to common sense to start with a volume building new subcompact CUV (STLA-M) and twin two larger ones with the GC/GW models, while working on a flagship luxury sedan above the Charger, Imperial. Instead, we got someone who wasted money on concepts with nothing to show for it.

Reply Like

click to expand...

If they are to split, CDJR should be the ones to reform under another banner from the EURO brands. Chrysler and Dodge are specific to the Americas, while RAM and Jeep have branched out to the global market. Americans will not give up their V8s for all this electrification nonsense, but they will compromise with mild/full hybrid models.

Give Dodge and Chrysler truly defined roles in the company. Dodge has has always been mainstream with sportiness in the same vein as Chevy and Ford, so it should remain while adding new models. Chrysler has been that slight step up like Buick, but it can be remodeled easily given that it only has one model (Voyager doesn't count as a second). If they had a real CEO for Chrysler, it would have been to common sense to start with a volume building new subcompact CUV (STLA-M) and twin two larger ones with the GC/GW models, while working on a flagship luxury sedan above the Charger, Imperial. Instead, we got someone who wasted money on concepts with nothing to show for it.

The total performance market in America is less than 400K. 400K!!! not the V8 performance market... The Entire including all powertrain options of which V8 is smaller subsection. To Keep that in Context the "electrification nonsense" Model Y Tesla sold 480K alone sold in North America.

So maybe we stop using that claim as crutch for delay launches, poor manufacturing, bad quality, poor integration, out of date powertrain, bad product mix, and worst of all Horrible Marketing.

Hanging on hat on rebuilding brands and markets on 400K total market is BAD IDEA. Hybrid are no longer a "compromise", it is a market requirement.

How about leading for once instead of trailing and using the past as boat anchor.

For sure some Halo models to drive traffic, but then you need something to actual sell volume stuff but they don't produce operational cashflow. Across all Brands. Jeep need domestic Renegade and Compass cannot be delayed anymore. Charger needs a 4 cylinder hybrid, yesterday. A NA model that can support a SRT4 version that drives traffic for SRT styled Compact SUV. A hornet that is NA made without the ugly nose. The Pacifica HAS TO BE REDONE STLA and REV is a must MUST. A fastback Compass Chrysler NOW(even though I personally hate these, people love them). Ram needs a version of Rampage more than a version of the Dakota.... but this should not be a either or... it needs a both. AND a STLA SMART EV Pickup and small Cargo van in the $20K range.
(we can stick our heads in the sand a miss the next EV grab of market share or again LEAD.) EV adoption is at the bottom of the market not the top. I have seen it with my own eyes elsewhere.

In general just product and utilization, unmade cars don't sell.

Reply 1 like

click to expand...

The connection with the Italian brands has greatly benefited Jeep and Ram in Latin America. Ironically the FCA side of the house also benefits the PSA brands in Mexico and South America. The fact that the world's smartest executive doesn't bring up South America is amazing because after the US, the Latin American operation is the next biggest money maker for the company.

So everybody hates the Chinese, but Leap Motor is an in-house brand at Stellantis. I would like to see some sort of engineering exchange program between Auburn Hills and wherever Leap is headquartered. The Jeep and Chrysler plugin models need some serious software upgrades and Leap seems to know how to get the job done.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Back to top button