fbpx
Chrysler
Trending

A Letter to the People: Saving Chrysler – A Call to Action

A Call to Investors and Workers to Rebuild the Automaker...

I am writing to you today not just as a concerned citizen but as someone with a deep, personal connection to one of our nation’s most iconic brands. My great-grandfather, Walter P. Chrysler, founded the Chrysler Corporation in 1925, a company that has since become a cornerstone of American automotive history. As we approach the 100th anniversary of Chrysler, with plans for what could be the largest gathering of Chrysler products ever seen in North America at next year’s Chrysler Carlisle event, I believe the time for change is now. And I am ready to lead that change.

For the past 45 years, I have proudly served as a Brand Ambassador for Chrysler. I’ve seen the highs and lows, the triumphs and challenges. But today, I believe we are at a critical juncture. The Chrysler brand, once a symbol of innovation and American ingenuity, is now at risk of fading into obscurity due to what I believe are poor decisions and mismanagement by its current owners, Stellantis.

Chrysler Corporation Founder Walter P. Chrysler, next to his first 1924 Chrysler Six.

Stellantis, a company that seems out of touch with the American market, has allowed sales to decline, delayed new product launches, and put the livelihoods of our dealers and workers in jeopardy. Prices are soaring, layoffs are looming, and the future of the brand hangs in the balance. Meanwhile, Stellantis’ CEO, Carlos Tavares, earns a staggering $39.5 million salary, a figure that seems grossly out of proportion given the struggles facing the company.

My great-grandfather was hired by General Motors (GM) in 1911 to save the failing Buick brand. Within a few years, he turned Buick into GM’s most profitable division. But even back then, poor management decisions, like investing in impractical projects, threatened to derail his efforts. This mirrors the situation today, where Stellantis’s investments in ventures like Archer Aviation seem to distract from the core business of building great cars. These funds would be better spent on revitalizing the Chrysler brand.

1961 Chrysler 300G Convertible in Formal Black.

The current management at Stellantis, overseeing more than 15 different brands, cannot give Chrysler the necessary attention. The result? Mediocrity at best. And now, with the potential entry of Chinese automaker BYD into the U.S. market, our industry faces an even greater threat. The influx of cheap cars could devastate our manufacturing base, and this is not just a possibility—it is a fact.

I was hopeful when Christine Feuell was appointed to lead the Chrysler brand. But year after year, we see Chrysler’s products being pushed further down the priority list while slow-selling brands like Fiat, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati receive more attention. Chrysler has deep roots in the American market, serving as a reliable and accessible option for the middle class. Does Stellantis understand this? Chrysler needs new products now, not tomorrow, not next year—now.

2009 Chrysler 200C EV Concept. 

Recently, United Auto Workers (UAW) President Shawn Fain criticized Stellantis and Carlos Tavares for failing to honor contracts. I stand with our workers, but it’s clear that the current approach is not working. Stellantis and GM are pricing themselves out of the market, and layoffs seem inevitable. This is a situation that cannot continue.

But I am not without hope. I am confident that investors will see the potential in resurrecting this historic brand. My vision is to bring Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep®, and Ram back as an American-owned company that focuses not only on profits but also on the people who build these cars. I propose creating a new Chrysler Corporation, with workers as part-owners of the company. This would give them a stake in the success of the company and ensure that their jobs are secure.

My 2023 Chrysler 300C, the last one built. 

This plan would also allow Stellantis to save face by exploring all options while offloading Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep®, and Ram to a company that truly cares about their future. This is not just a business opportunity but a chance to restore pride in an American icon and secure the future for thousands of workers.

The situation is dire, but with the right leadership and a clear vision, I believe we can turn things around. The time for action is now, and I am ready to step up and save the brand that my great-grandfather built. With the support of investors and the commitment of our workers, we can ensure that the Chrysler name lives on for another 100 years.

Sincerely,
Frank B. Rhodes, Jr.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

Where are the MAX Wedge & Mini MAX V8s? I've had Mercedes, Audi, Ford twin turbo vehicles and they all Suck so no comments about the Hurricane. A high compression V8 is far superior to a little 6 cyl with low comp and boost for instant power, no contest.

The Pacifica is the only Chrysler vehicle to have real design time in the last 20 years. CDJR: The N.A. V8s haven't had any technology updates in over 15 years. I've been a Mechanical Design Engineer for 25 years and have seen very few in upper management that can lead well. Stellantis & UAW leadership are typical modern jokes of an organization. Gutting companies, massive bonuses, and nothing being developed. The FCA Italy, Fat Cats, & BEVs got all the money and nothing to show for it now.

Reply 11 Likes

click to expand...

This is a fantastic letter.

What are the next steps? How do we get involved and help?

Reply 14 Likes

I hope and pray you are successful. Been a diehard Mopar guy since the late seventies, but my last purchase (2024) was a GM product. Stellantis has aggravated me no end and the current product is lacking, while the prices have become absurd. They still have no clue when it comes to the American market. Ignorant bastards !

Reply 10 Likes

This is a fantastic letter.

What are the next steps? How do we get involved and help?

I would like to help as well

Reply 2 Likes

If the Chrysler brand is in immediate need of new product (it is) you could start by taking the existing Jeep Wagoneer, give it some flash and sizzle, and then rebadge it as the new Imperial. Then set its base price below Escalade and Navigator to both generate interest and make it a good value proposition. The (currently overpriced) premium Jeep Grand Wagoneer is more a GMC Yukon Denali rival and should be treated as such. (As a side note, the regular Wagoneer's inflated base MSRP should also be more in line with Tahoe/Expedition).

As for the now defunct 300 the only way I'd greenlight a new model based on the upcoming 2025 Charger is if it had suicide doors standard. Sure they'd be a gimmick, but with car sales currently moribund the only way a product in this dying segment could have realistic shot at success is if its design were truly out-of-the-box unique. For the cherry on top make its base price below 50k, making it into a true poor man's Rolls Royce. (Only stumbling block I can see design wise for suicide doors is that you need to have seems between the doors and rear fenders that are virtually straight for them to function (look at current Rolls Royces and previous Continentals for reference). That would probably necessitate a wheelbase stretch, costing time and money.

In the early 2000s Chrysler was very successful at being a purveyor of unique vehicles with products like the PT Cruiser and 300 and they should consider returning to that formula.

Reply 4 Likes

click to expand...

Back to top button