Ram
Trending

Why Ram Can’t Build a Full-Size Truck for Under $40K?

Ram Boss Tim Kuniskis Explains the Harsh Reality Behind Pickup Truck Pricing

If you’ve been wondering why there’s no stripped-down Ram 1500 (DT) you can drive off the lot for under $40,000 anymore, you’re not alone. Truck prices have climbed so high that many of us assumed Ram could simply create a “bare bones” version of their modern DT pickups to fill the void left by the now-discontinued Classic (DS).

But Ram CEO Tim Kuniskis recently shut down that idea in plain terms at a media event in Auburn Hills, Michigan. His message? That era is gone — and it’s not coming back.

“Those Days Are Gone” –

2024 Ram 1500 Classic Tradesman SXT Crew Cab 4×4. (Ram).

When asked why Ram can’t simply build a no-frills $40,000 truck, Kuniskis replied bluntly:

“Well, those days are gone. Stop comparing those to things pre-COVID in any product in any industry. You can’t do it, right? So, getting back to a $40,000 price point average, it’s impossible. You can’t do it.”

He’s referring to the good old days when a Ram 1500 Classic could be had for around $36,000. According to TrueCar.com, the 2024 Classic averaged just over $36,000 in transaction price (with incentives) — a solid value for a full-size truck.

But that truck’s gone, and even Ram’s most affordable current options — the V6 Warlock and Black Express models — start well above that.

“The Black Express is going to be a killer package in that space. And when we get to the point where you can do a Black Express with the 5.7-liter HEMI® and that price point — [we hit a] sweet spot,” Kuniskis added.

Just not that sweet. Not $40,000-sweet.

It’s Not Just About Stripping Features – 

2025 Ram 1500 Tradesman Crew Cab 6-Foot, 4-Inch Box, 4×4. (Ram).

One of the biggest misconceptions is that if Ram just dropped the power windows, touchscreen, or electronic locks, they’d magically hit a sub-$40K price tag. Kuniskis says it doesn’t work that way.

“Get a Tradesman today, and you tell me what I am going to strip out. What am I going to strip out of a Tradesman today to get to that price point? I’m going to save $1,000, maybe? I can’t get to $40,000. I can’t. I just can’t do it. I’d love to.”

And he’s right. The Tradesman — Ram’s most basic full-size pickup — a Quad Cab with a 6-foot, 4-inch box and 4×2 configuration, featuring the 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 with eTorque mild-hybrid system, already starts at $40,275 before destination fees. If you think crank windows and no A/C would change that, think again. The cost savings are minimal, and customer demand for truly stripped-down trucks just isn’t there. Ford learned that the hard way and dropped their base manual models years ago.

Safety and Emissions Requirements Add Up – 

2025 Ram 1500 Tradesman Crew Cab 6-Foot, 4-Inch Box, 4×4. (Ram).

One of the biggest reasons why a sub-$40,000 full-size truck is no longer realistic is the amount of safety and emissions equipment that’s now federally mandated. Modern trucks, even in their most basic forms, must come equipped with backup cameras, airbags, tire pressure monitoring systems, LATCH child seat anchors, and rear seatbelt reminders. Even the sound alerts for electric or hybrid vehicles are required by law. These aren’t optional features — automakers are required to include them on every vehicle they sell in the U.S., and that adds cost right out of the gate.

On the emissions side, regulations have only become tighter over the decades, with federal laws like Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) pushing automakers to make their vehicles more fuel-efficient. Even if the current U.S. administration is cutting policies in favor of automakers, administrations change. Additionally, it is essential to note that the Ram 1500 is a global product, which must conform to various regulations and emissions standards in different markets.

That has led to the adoption of expensive technologies, such as catalytic converters, oxygen sensors, EGR systems, and computer-controlled engine management. To meet fuel economy standards, manufacturers have also made engineering decisions — such as using turbochargers, cylinder deactivation, multi-speed transmissions, lightweight aluminum components, and even hybrid systems — that are not federally mandated but necessary to comply with fuel economy targets.

While these changes are great for reducing pollution and increasing fuel economy, they’re not cheap. Each one adds complexity, cost, and in many cases, weight savings that come at a higher price. All of that gets baked into the cost of even the most basic pickup truck on the lot today.

Not Corporate Greed, Just Reality – 

Ram CEO Tim Kuniskis. (MoparInsiders).

There’s a popular idea floating around that this is all corporate greed — that automakers just don’t want to build affordable trucks. But Kuniskis explained it’s not about greed — it’s basic economics.

“Because I’d lose money,” he said plainly.

Even with a 10% margin on vehicle sales, the cost of building a truck that meets today’s safety and emissions standards makes a sub-$40,000 price tag impossible.

If Ram could build a no-frills truck and make money doing it, they absolutely would. Volume matters, and automakers aren’t just chasing high-dollar buyers — they still want fleet and work truck sales, too.

So What’s Next? – 

2026 Ram 1500 Warlock Pentastar V6 with eTorque Prototype. (MoparInsiders).

Until a mid-size pickup takes the baton, Kuniskis says Ram is doing what it can to bring value to buyers with lower-cost variants, such as the V6 Warlock and Express. But they’re never going to touch the price point of the old Classic again.

“Did we lose volume? Yes,” Kuniskis admitted. “I lost a lot more before these moves, but I think we will crawl back some of them. Not all of them. Because I’ll never get back to $40,000. Until I get a mid-size truck.”

The truck market has changed. The $40,000 full-size truck? It’s history. And even Ram’s CEO says there’s no going back.

Robert S. Miller

Robert S. Miller is a diehard Mopar enthusiast who lives and breathes all that is Mopar. The Michigander is not only the Editor for MoparInsiders.com, 5thGenRams.com, and HDRams.com but an automotive photographer. He is an avid fan of offshore powerboat racing, which he travels the country to take part in.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

I just don’t see an issue. If you want a new truck just get a larger loan or lease.
I realize for some that might be a bridge too far, but I upped the ante more than once to get the vehicle I wanted, but the extra cost faded away in short order as it became a familiar expense that never mattered in the overall picture.
This whole discussion makes for good banter, but most folks know you got to pay to play and that’s a fact Jack. I love asking kids what do you think this candy bar cost when I was your age? Nope kid, 5 cents ! Well kid, I use to visit a farm in the Bronx to pet the animals and horses drew wagons up my block every day and a Ram was an animal before it was a truck. You get it, time marches on.
Believe me on that farm and those horses in the Bronx, NYC…. Word.

Reply Like

click to expand...

I think the average person gets it. It is 2025, them days are over. Try buying a house for under $250,000 in New England, NY or NJ. Forget about it! I get your point Tim, every thing goes up. You did say, “Until a mid-size pickup takes the baton”. We’ll then, get er done! Problem solved.

Reply Like

My 1974 Dodge D-100 had an 8-foot and a 131" wheelbase and was considered a full size truck. The 2025 Toyota Tacoma has the same 131" wheelbase and yet today it is considered a mid-size.

Reply Like

Honestly, most people don't really need a modern day 1500-series pickup truck. Most of us don't tow large boats or campers, most of us aren't into construction, or anything that really requires the use of a full size 1500-series truck. A mid-size truck like a Ranger, Tacoma, Canyon/Colorado would pretty much take care of about 75% of non-commercial truck owners while the 1500 and up sized pickup trucks taking up most of the remaining 25%. Bring out a mid-size STLA frame Dakota with the Hurricane-6 engines and leave the Hemis for the 1500 trucks. Make the Dakota slightly larger than the Ranger and the Canyon, put the hurricane-6 engines in it (both of them) have the 3.6L Hybrid as the base powertrain and literally just make it a smaller Ram 1500 truck with all of the features and trim packages of its larger V8 powered brother but with the Hurricane-6 engines. Simple and profitable. The powertrains and platforms are already in place, retool the US plants for everything Mopar and move forward Tariff free and make vehicles that work.
I think one of the biggest things in the American market is that everything is over sized and over powered and we wonder why things are so overpriced. For one, the lack of diversity in the Mopar brands causes everything to be over priced because nothing is spread out. Everything is condensed into a few models and since the selling volume isn't high, the prices are. Right now Dodge has three vehicles, the Charger EV, the Durango and the Hornet. The only one selling right now is the age-old Durango. If Dodge had a bigger portfolio, it could offset those losses better and it would help drive costs down. Granted this setup was done by Carlos Tavares who intentionally tried to destroy the American brands so that they could be replaced by european brands but the point remains, Each of the Mopar brands needs more vehicle options in each of their lineups. Dodge needs about seven STLA:Large platform vehicles with Longitudinally mounted powertrains including a new 4-door Dart hatchback/fastback, a 4-door only Charger, a Coronet 2-row performance wagon, the 3-row Durango SUV, a Dodge Grand Caravan redesign more SUV-like, a Dodge Journey 2-row SUV and the return of the Jeep-like Dodge Nitro SUV. Ram needs to fall back under the Dodge umbrella and have everything STLA frame from the Dakota all the way up to the Ram HD trucks. One brand, one mission. US Market domination. Let Jeep go to Africa since is really big there and let Chrysler go to Australia and return to the old days of Inline-6 performance glory on the STLA Large platform. Have a Dodge-Latin American market with the Dodge Hornet, the Dodge Rampage, and the Dodge Attitude all on the STLA Medium frame, dumping the other brands like Fiat, Alfa Romeo and Maserati back on Europe with their other weird cars like Peugot and Citroen and whatever else they have. Let the European market focus on EVs and the STLA Small and STLA Medium platform as they have no need for anything else. Let them focus on 1.3L Turbo hybrids and full electric vehicles. Let that be the bulk of the so called "Clean energy" movement. Focus the US Market on Pentastar V6 Hybrid, Hurricane-6 and updated Hemi powertrains, Dumping the 5.7L Hemi for a more robust & Modern 425hp/450tq 6.1L Hemi that can sit below a 445hp/480tq 3.0L S/O Hurricane, a 520hp/500tq 6.4L Hemi, a 550hp/531tq 3.0 Hurricane H/O and beyond. Have a base engine of a worthwhile upgraded 3.6L Pentastar hybrid making 395hp and 430lb-ft of torque. That's what the American Market needs, just one good badass American brand. DODGE! No FWD nonsense, no transaxles, none of that, just vehicles with engines mounted in the correct way, everything with AWD and everything made the way it is supposed to be. Right here in the USA. If we need another brand or two, bring back Plymouth and AMC. The AMC brand allows us to keep the Wrangler and then bring out vehicles like the AMC Eagle, AMC Wrangler, AMC Wagoneer and a bare bones basic AMC J-10 midsize pickup similar to the Gladiator but different. Plymouth would return to give us a true Mustang-destroying Barracuda fastback with AWD and Hurricane power, A Plymouth GTX 4-door luxury muscle gran-coupe a Bronco-destroying Trailduster SUV and a Plymouth Voyager SUV-like minivan, all on the STLA Large platform. Time to Make American Vehicles Great Again!

Reply Like

click to expand...
Back to top button