AuctionsChrysler
Trending

27k-Mile 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT Hits BringATrailer

Turbocharged Cruiser with Low Miles and No Reserve

When Chrysler launched the PT Cruiser, it stood out for its retro styling, practical interior, and quirky charm. But the GT trim took things up a notch, adding real performance to the mix. Now, a clean and very low-mileage example is hitting the auction block with no reserve on BringATrailer.

2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT. (BringATrailer).

This 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT shows just 27,000 miles on the odometer and is powered by a turbocharged 2.4-liter I4 engine rated at 220 horsepower and 245 lb-ft of torque. That power is sent to the front wheels through a 4-speed automatic transaxle. While the PT Cruiser has always been known as a family-friendly runabout, the GT gave buyers a surprising amount of punch thanks to the factory turbo motor.

Finished in Black (PX8) over Dark Slate Gray leather, the car comes equipped with the Light Group and Power Convenience Group, giving it features like fog lights, a sunroof, heated seats, and cruise control. The exterior is accented with a rear spoiler, black trim, and 17-inch five-spoke alloy wheels wrapped in Goodyear Eagle GT tires. Four-wheel disc brakes with ABS provide stopping power.

2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT. (BringATrailer).

Inside, the PT Cruiser GT blends retro design with modern convenience. You’ll find heated leather bucket seats, a power-adjustable driver’s seat, a 6-disc CD stereo, air conditioning, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel framing a 140-mph speedometer and 8k-rpm tachometer. 

This example is being offered with a clean Wisconsin title and a clean Carfax report showing no accidents or damage. Paint chips and blemishes on the front end are noted, but overall, this PT Cruiser GT presents as a rare survivor in the modern classic market.

2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT. (BringATrailer).

With no reserve, it’ll be interesting to see where the hammer falls when bidding wraps up on Friday, August 22 at 3:55 p.m. EDT. For enthusiasts looking for a unique piece of Chrysler’s early-2000s lineup, this PT Cruiser GT checks a lot of boxes: low miles, clean history, and a turbo punch

2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser Image Gallery:

Robert S. Miller

Robert S. Miller is a diehard Mopar enthusiast who lives and breathes all that is Mopar. The Michigander is not only the Editor for MoparInsiders.com, 5thGenRams.com, and HDRams.com but an automotive photographer. He is an avid fan of offshore powerboat racing, which he travels the country to take part in.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

Some of that will improve with scale, especially in battery manufacturing, the logistics alone right now are insane.

Reply 1 like

Considering that Tesla has insane profit margins and their models are price competitive within the respective segment with ICE vehicles they have shown that it's possible to make EVs profitably and competitively with ICEs.
Tavares is just crying and moaning because Stellantis (mainly the euro side) was caught with their pants down and started this path much later than they should've. Now they're caught between Tesla's price cuts on one side and on MG's and BYD's hyper-competitive EVs on the other. Thus, Stellantis cannot now overcharge for subpar EVs with small battery packs like the e208, Avenger or the upcoming e308 and Astra-e.

Reply 1 like

Telsa makes everything at a single sight. Most of the current OEM are shipping components long distances in expendable dunnage.

This will change soon, Kokomo is at full speed, GM and Fords battery plants are all under construction. They always think of logistics last, you cannot do this with these Class 3 hazardous goods. It massively is adding to cost of manufacturing what should be simpler process.

Reply 3 likes

Considering that Tesla has insane profit margins and their models are price competitive within the respective segment with ICE vehicles they have shown that it's possible to make EVs profitably and competitively with ICEs.
Tavares is just crying and moaning because Stellantis (mainly the euro side) was caught with their pants down and started this path much later than they should've. Now they're caught between Tesla's price cuts on one side and on MG's and BYD's hyper-competitive EVs on the other. Thus, Stellantis cannot now overcharge for subpar EVs with small battery packs like the e208, Avenger or the upcoming e308 and Astra-e.

Agreed. There are no STLA 'passion Product' EVs in the same manner as the existing STLA ICE vehicles. STLA cannot get away with their same shenanigans with an EV Jeep portfolio that they did with the ICE Jeep portfolio. I'm only talking about the US, I could care less what STLA Europe does, but the underlying assumption I describe loosely holds true. There is no existing Customer loyalty (a group they've abused with higher prices) attached to Jeep EVs. Those Customers will simply go to the OEM that will build ICE vehicles. I'm not talking about going to an overpriced Bronco either. You're going to have people going to the 2024 Tacoma and 2025 4Runner, body on frame vehicles with mild-hybrids at competitive prices. The GM mid-size pickups are stupid expensive, almost the same as an overpriced Wrangler.

It's all happening on the JLWranglerForums, if these stupid executives would read it. People are migrating away from Jeep, it's already started.

Everything I predicted about the downfall of US CDJR will eventually happen if this management group remains in place. 2022 was the top of the market, in terms of vehicles sold/profits - vehicle volumes were (and still are) less than pre-Covid, but results/profits were goosed due to limited vehicle supply because of Covid/supply chain issues. That's not the case anymore - vehicle deliveries are falling (due to higher interest rates), dealer lots are packed with unsold vehicles, and ASPs are (finally) going to start coming down if they have any hope of moving metal. Its all downhill from here.

Reply 1 like

click to expand...

Agreed. There are no STLA 'passion Product' EVs in the same manner as the existing STLA ICE vehicles. STLA cannot get away with their same shenanigans with an EV Jeep portfolio that they did with the ICE Jeep portfolio. I'm only talking about the US, I could care less what STLA Europe does, but the underlying assumption I describe loosely holds true. There is no existing Customer loyalty (a group they've abused with higher prices) attached to Jeep EVs. Those Customers will simply go to the OEM that will build ICE vehicles. I'm not talking about going to an overpriced Bronco either. You're going to have people going to the 2024 Tacoma and 2025 4Runner, body on frame vehicles with mild-hybrids at competitive prices. The GM mid-size pickups are stupid expensive, almost the same as an overpriced Wrangler.

It's all happening on the JLWranglerForums, if these stupid executives would read it. People are migrating away from Jeep, it's already started.

Everything I predicted about the downfall of US CDJR will eventually happen if this management group remains in place. 2022 was the top of the market, in terms of vehicles sold/profits - vehicle volumes were (and still are) less than pre-Covid, but results/profits were goosed due to limited vehicle supply because of Covid/supply chain issues. That's not the case anymore - vehicle deliveries are falling (due to higher interest rates), dealer lots are packed with unsold vehicles, and ASPs are (finally) going to start coming down if they have any hope of moving metal. Its all downhill from here.

“Wrangler overpriced” is complete nonsense (in 2018 it was nonsense, and 2023 still nonsense) .
1:Lower priced JK Models had lower take rates, while models with higher trim levels with options sold better.
2: The company believe that historically the Wrangler was underpriced , decisions to take actions to correct the underpricing was made back in 2015.
3:2015 decision was made Wrangler needed more Options/Trims/Packages

4Runner is a very different vehicle than Wrangler and if the 4Runner is a Wrangler competitor then so is the Tahoe.

Reply 2 likes

click to expand...

Back to top button