fbpx
StellantisUAW
Trending

Stellantis Sues UAW Local 186 Over Strike Authorization Dispute

Legal Action Follows Violation of CBA Grievance Procedures...

Stellantis is preparing to take legal action against the United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 186, representing the Mopar Denver Parts Distribution Center (PDC) employees. This follows a recent strike authorization vote held by the Local, which Stellantis argues did not adhere to the established grievance procedures outlined in the 2023 UAW-Stellantis Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA).

Grievance Process and Legal Justification – 

According to the CBA, the process for handling strikable grievances involves three distinct steps, each granting the company a specific timeframe to respond to grievances raised by the union. The UAW had previously informed its members about these steps during a Facebook Live session, emphasizing the importance of following the outlined procedure. However, it remains unclear whether the Local independently chose to bypass this education or if there were instructions from UAW International to disregard the process. Either way, Stellantis contends that the required steps were not followed.

In the Denver PDC case, UAW members voted on strike authorization before completing the third step of the grievance process. This action has prompted Stellantis to assert that any potential strike resulting from this vote would be illegal, as the necessary contractual requirements were not met.

Upcoming Lawsuits – 

The forthcoming lawsuit will be one of two that Stellantis plans to file against the UAW and various local unions. The automaker is contesting the UAW’s failure to honor its contractual obligations and claims that the union violated clear guidelines in Investment Letter 311, which grants the company discretion in business decisions. Stellantis also opposes the UAW’s call for a mid-contract strike based on unresolved grievances and seeks monetary damages through this litigation.

UAW’s Response and Broader Implications – 

This legal challenge follows another significant development at the Mopar Los Angeles Parts Distribution Center, where a strike authorization vote resulted in a “yes” from union members. Following this vote, Stellantis filed a lawsuit against UAW Local 230 on October 3. The company subsequently filed eight additional lawsuits against the UAW and 23 local unions on October 4, indicating a firm stance against what it views as violations of the CBA.

In response to these developments, the UAW proposed reinstating a program known as the Jobs Bank, which had previously been a controversial issue during the automaker’s bankruptcy in 2009. This situation highlights ongoing tensions between Stellantis and the UAW as both parties navigate the complexities of labor relations and contractual agreements in the automotive industry.

Robert S. Miller

Robert S. Miller is a diehard Mopar enthusiast who lives and breathes all that is Mopar. The Michigander is not only the Editor for MoparInsiders.com, 5thGenRams.com, and HDRams.com but an automotive photographer. He is an avid fan of offshore powerboat racing, which he travels the country to take part in.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

UAW Criticizes Stellantis Layoffs at Sterling Heights Plant​

Stellantis Cites Market Conditions For Job Cuts...​

1727300843586.png

Stellantis has announced plans to lay off 191 workers at its Sterling Heights Assembly Plant (SHAP) in Metro Detroit, a move that has sparked sharp criticism from the United Auto Workers (UAW). The layoffs, set to take effect on October 1, 2024, will primarily impact seasonal supplemental employees who were hired to cover for increased summer vacation periods. Stellantis pointed to challenging market conditions and the need for operational adjustments as the primary reasons behind the job cuts.

Reply Like

click to expand...

???????? Who did the Union just endorse for President? This is BS on Fain's part he knows DAMN well that a EV takes 30% less labor to produce, and that doesn't include how much of that is off loaded to Asia.

Not to mention even in the CARB states there is a disconnect between the regulatory and consumer.

I am not trying to insert politics in it but the difference between one side of the isle is clear on subject. ONE very much believes that there is a single solution to Climate change, and it is the forced adoption of EV vehicles.

Reply 1 Like

???????? Who did the Union just endorse for President? This is BS on Fain's part he knows DAMN well that a EV takes 30% less labor to produce, and that doesn't include how much of that is off loaded to Asia.

Not to mention even in the CARB states there is a disconnect between the regulatory and consumer.

I am not trying to insert politics in it but the difference between one side of the isle is clear on subject. ONE very much believes that there is a single solution to Climate change, and it is the forced adoption of EV vehicles.

The union didn't endorse Kamala, Shawn Fain is. I know a lot of people who are UAW members who are voting the other way.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

The union didn't endorse Kamala, Shawn Fain is. I know a lot of people who are UAW members who are voting the other way.

Yes, in detail you are correct. But the same organization head is complaining about something HE endorsed.

Reply 2 Likes

Back to top button