Luisdavid458
New member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2018
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Last edited:
HELLCAT will be sticking around in the next generation.
"What I can tell you is the passenger vehicles that we continue in our brands are important, particularly the Dodge vehicles,” he said. “They’ve done well for Dodge this year even though that segment has been under pressure and they’re part of the Dodge DNA. That’s going to continue. Pacifica is very very important for us, not just in terms of the relationships it’s helped us form, with Waymo as an example, but Chrysler is known as a leader in people movers. That’s where the Chrysler brand continues to be developed.”
So, the hybridization will come from the inclusion of the e-Torque?
I don’t think any others are viable alternatives as much as they are money-wasting science projects.So no other alternative is being considered besides electric???
Don’t worry, though the battery technology is largely there, the plant capacity is still a ways way.
All of these new electric cars will need the new battery chemistry now coming online, and the ability to produce the chemistry in mass quantity just doesn’t exist yet.
The absolute bleeding edge car makers have plans in place to intro the new chemistry as soon as 2020 (very low production numbers).
Volkswagen has already said it’s production will be 100% BEV by 2025. And, there are respected experts that estimate 2029/30 will be the year that BEVs are more economical than ICE to produce, and own.
So, you have until then, or at least according to “the experts”. As a SME (subject matter to expert) in the field, I am inclined to agree with them.
After that, you’ll be like me. I have to go to the used market, because the cars I want simply aren’t made.
The new chemistry is very promising, too. The lowest of expectations doubles the energy density of the most dense current technology. It is pretty apparent that the new chemistry will easily outlive the car, and possibly even outlive the person that owns the car (one team claims to have a chemistry that allows for 23,000+ deep charge/discharge cycles—63 years in other words). Recharge times, safety, cost of manufacture, raw materials, and reliability all have commensurate improvements.
So, imagine a Tesla with at least twice the density, and five times the life, that recharges relatively quickly, with zero associated risks? That car would decimate any gasoline car in any chosen race. The only way ICE would be better is sexiness and allure.
Don’t worry, though the battery technology is largely there, the plant capacity is still a ways way.
All of these new electric cars will need the new battery chemistry now coming online, and the ability to produce the chemistry in mass quantity just doesn’t exist yet.
The absolute bleeding edge car makers have plans in place to intro the new chemistry as soon as 2020 (very low production numbers).
Volkswagen has already said it’s production will be 100% BEV by 2025. And, there are respected experts that estimate 2029/30 will be the year that BEVs are more economical than ICE to produce, and own.
I know right?I attended a conference last week and we discussed Lithium-Ion battery design and application as it related to aircraft and I was very surprised by the new technology in a battery weighing 60 per cent less and has virtually no amperage and voltage loss over a long time was amazing. It was interesting that each battery has it's own computer chip that regulates it's operation to even keeping itself warm to 20 below zero.
I don't know whats beyond the horizon.
Volkswagen has already said it’s production will be 100% BEV by 2025.
I'm referring to alternative-fuel sources like hydrogen.P2 MHEV with eBooster... But maybe FCA will call it same as eTorque which is a P0 (FCA calls it P1F) MHEV system.