Mopar Insiders Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Stellantis, Toyota withdraws from lawsuit against California. Settlement of POTUS/CA that ICE Ban to be finalize by March 2022

AlexB

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2018
Messages
2,021
Reaction score
1,345
The White House is also expected to explore ways to adopt the California policy requiring all new vehicles sold after 2035 to release no emissions
The Obama-era standards, which were modeled on California’s, would have required auto companies to make and sell vehicles that reached an average fuel economy of about 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. The standards, which would have eliminated about six billion tons of planet-warming carbon dioxide pollution over the lifetime of the vehicles, stood as the single largest federal policy ever enacted to reduce climate change.

The Trump administration last year rolled back that standard to about 40 miles per gallon by 2026 — a move which would have effectively allowed most of that carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere. California, however, reached a separate deal with the five automakers, in which they agreed to reach a standard of 51 miles per gallon by 2026. The Trump administration, backed by G.M. and other automakers, blocked California’s legal authority to set those standards.
.The Biden administration is already moving swiftly to craft that new standard, which will be jointly released by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Transportation. On Wednesday, the Senate confirmed the new Transportation Secretary, Pete Buttigieg. In his confirmation hearing, Mr. Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Ind., and a 2020 presidential contender, vowed to make tackling climate change a guiding principal of his tenure — a first for a transportation secretary.
Though the California deal sets a standard of 51 miles per gallon for model year 2026, the coming Biden rule will likely take a year or more to complete. So its first targets will be later, 2028 or 2029. California and environmental groups are likely to push for standards that are even more aggressive to help meet the goal of ending sales of gasoline- and diesel-powered cars by 2035.

Crafting such rules could be a lengthy and complex process, but several people close to the administration say they expect that the E.P.A. and Transportation Department to publish a “notice of proposed rule making” — essentially, a document that launches the one-to-two-year legal process of drafting and implementing such rules — by March.
Automakers Drop Efforts to Derail California Climate Rules - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
 
Last edited:

KrisW

Active member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
138
Reaction score
226
Today, the US domestic air-conditioning and space-heating market is owned by a handful of European and Japanese companies. This came about because in the 1970s domestic energy costs in Japan and Europe increased dramatically, and governments there pushed for strict power-efficiency standards to control costs and reduce reliance on imported fuels. It was tough for domestic equipment makers to meet the targets, but they did it. Then, when they exported their products to the USA, those products totally outclassed what the US industry was making, buyers flocked to the foreign product, as it was far more efficient, and soon the American companies were closing or being bought by foreign competitors.

The point of that story should be obvious: environmental standards for cars are not just about the climate; they are also about protecting US industry by preparing it for the future. Regardless of what the US does on ICE, the rest of the world's car making nations are moving to electric propulsion. Sooner or later, the US public will move to electric too - it really is a better solution for the majority of customers. It's important that when that day comes, there is an American EV industry that can supply them.

The previous policy was like a football coach giving the team three months off right before the start of the season... while every other team was training six days a week.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top