What's new
Mopar Insiders Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chrysler/Ram CEO Discusses Brand Challenges

Chrysler/Ram CEO Discusses Brand Challenges​

Chris Feuell on the Challenges Facing Chrysler and Ram...​


1722804993328.png

Christine Feuell’s leadership of both the Ram and Chrysler brands within Stellantis North America marks a significant shift amid recent management changes. Having joined Stellantis in September 2021, Feuell now holds the crucial role of overseeing these two distinct brands—Ram, a major player in the pickup and commercial vehicle segments, and Chrysler, which is transitioning to an electric-only mainstream lineup by 2028.

 
Under Feuell’s leadership not a single new vehicle has been launched, not even a preview hint at something specific to drool over. Airflow, withdrawn as it was obvious it was never able to give Chrysler a distinctive brand look. Strike one. Needless to say I have little confidence in her ability to resurrect Chrysler let alone head up two brands facing serious issues. Am I excited about the REV and Ramcharger....NO !
She must talk a good line of horsefeathers or has some unseen hidden talent, but two divisions, no product, really ! Strike two.
Hope she makes me take a seat on the bench, but for now, zero confidence in what is a ghost career with nothing to show. Someone must love this women. Got me stumped by her curve ball I guess.
 
Under Feuell’s leadership not a single new vehicle has been launched, not even a preview hint at something specific to drool over. Airflow, withdrawn as it was obvious it was never able to give Chrysler a distinctive brand look. Strike one. Needless to say I have little confidence in her ability to resurrect Chrysler let alone head up two brands facing serious issues. Am I excited about the REV and Ramcharger....NO !
She must talk a good line of horsefeathers or has some unseen hidden talent, but two divisions, no product, really ! Strike two.
Hope she makes me take a seat on the bench, but for now, zero confidence in what is a ghost career with nothing to show. Someone must love this women. Got me stumped by her curve ball I guess.
I will agree with you on the REV but the Ramcharger even though we know its not going to be affordable it is something that does spark my interest, I would concentrate on getting your product on the ground and get the costs down on RAM that is the major hurdle that is what the Greenhorn who is in charge of Stellantis doesn't knows about N American is we like our Trucks and SUV's and for them to be affordable, I do not want or need to take out a mortgage on a pickup truck. In 6 years the cost of a pickup truck market has risen almost 25%, On Feuells defense though she was left with nothing absolutely nothing in the pipeline besides the dying 300 and a 6-7 year old minivan when she was given the reigns. It is hard to right a ship when it has already capsized, at least Ram has continually updated the Ram 1500's but the HD market does need some much needed TLC to get it back in fray !!!
 
I have never seen a car company so bankrupt of product as the current state of FCA in US. Journey, Caravan, Cherokee, all gone with no replacements in sight. Can you ever picture GM, Ford, Honda or Toyota doing this. What a sad state for the buyers and the dealers. It is a sure way to drive your customers elsewhere.
 
Ramcharger is cool. In fact, I’d be semi-interested in it.

The idea of waiting for a new Chrysler until ‘26 is laughable at best. You do not kill the only product that sells, without a replacement. Chrysler has been mishandled for a decade at least, it’s borderline criminal what they’ve done (and that’s over several management changes).

Ram is fine. Really need a true 5th gen HD. Why they refuse to put the new (now old already) cab on the HD platform is beyond me.

A bunch of mismanagement up top
 
Ramcharger is cool. In fact, I’d be semi-interested in it.

The idea of waiting for a new Chrysler until ‘26 is laughable at best. You do not kill the only product that sells, without a replacement. Chrysler has been mishandled for a decade at least, it’s borderline criminal what they’ve done (and that’s over several management changes).

Ram is fine. Really need a true 5th gen HD. Why they refuse to put the new (now old already) cab on the HD platform is beyond me.

A bunch of mismanagement up top

There was a rumor that they might add Ram HD production at Warren. If true, that might explain why they have delayed updating the cab. I have no idea, just speculating/guessing.
 
She must talk a good line of horsefeathers or has some unseen hidden talent, but two divisions, no product, really ! Strike two.
Hope she makes me take a seat on the bench, but for now, zero confidence in what is a ghost career with nothing to show. Someone must love this women. Got me stumped by her curve ball I guess.
Bill, you must have been out of the work force for awhile. Haven't you had to deal with or even heard of a DEI hire?
 
It is truly sad watching the Chrysler and Dodge brands wither away to nothing.

Over the years, I had a number of Chryslers, and enjoyed them all. Probably my favorite was the 2000 LHS. Great car.

Now there's nothing left. No products. No meaningful product pipeline. And an incompetent DEI hire in charge.

RIP
 
It is truly sad watching the Chrysler and Dodge brands wither away to nothing.

Over the years, I had a number of Chryslers, and enjoyed them all. Probably my favorite was the 2000 LHS. Great car.

Now there's nothing left. No products. No meaningful product pipeline. And an incompetent DEI hire in charge.

RIP
Diamler Killed Chrysler, literally it was dead.... not exaggerating, Dodge also. Both were dead. I know not many people know this and it wasn't Daimler by then it was the New Yorker private equity people just to make it worse sharing that heritage name.

If not for Fiat coming in at the last hour with shock pads, they both would be on the trash heap of history with Desoto, Fargo, Imperial, Eagle, and Plymouth.

Daimler created this identity crisis with making it more Plymouth than Chrysler with the death of American Traditional Luxury.

Dodge will be fine it found it identity that isn't sub-prime.

Chrysler has to find a new Niche, or it is likely finally going to succumb to Daimlers fatal blow. It a little unfair to call the latest doctor DEI, heck, often the finer Doctors are the more empathetic gender.

"The brand is preparing to unveil its first electric vehicle (EV), a crossover, in 2026, with additional EVs planned thereafter. Feuell noted a delay in the initial rollout of Chrysler’s electric crossover, attributed to broader delays in battery-electric vehicle (BEV) launches. “The Chrysler BEV got caught up in that timing shift,” she said, but she remains confident in the vehicle’s readiness."

When you say Meaningful do you mean what you think Chrysler should be, or did you miss this?
 
Under Feuell’s leadership not a single new vehicle has been launched, not even a preview hint at something specific to drool over. Airflow, withdrawn as it was obvious it was never able to give Chrysler a distinctive brand look. Strike one. Needless to say I have little confidence in her ability to resurrect Chrysler let alone head up two brands facing serious issues. Am I excited about the REV and Ramcharger....NO !
She must talk a good line of horsefeathers or has some unseen hidden talent, but two divisions, no product, really ! Strike two.
Hope she makes me take a seat on the bench, but for now, zero confidence in what is a ghost career with nothing to show. Someone must love this women. Got me stumped by her curve ball I guess.

Feuell got to Stellantis in September 2021, the Airflow premiered at CES in January 2022. It was clearly not her work, and even in the Airflow press release they mentioned that the concept was not going to production and that a Chrysler electric SUV would come to market by 2025. It has clearly been delayed, but as the article references that was a Stellantis-wide delay for BEVs and not specifically her fault.

Secondly, she just took over RAM 3 months ago and you're blaming her for product plans made years before she took over? I mean by all means hold these execs accountable but no one has a magic wand.

Bill, you must have been out of the work force for awhile. Haven't you had to deal with or even heard of a DEI hire?

I'd say that's a sad state of affairs that you think all of this stemming from her being a DEI hire. A truly ridiculous comment given what has transpired over the last several years at Stellantis.
 
The fact that she is out there bull shooting us is an indication she is a DEI hire. I didn't say she was the cause of the mess the brand is in. Two brands being managed by a DEI hire is a symptom of something seriously wrong with Stellantis.
 
The fact that she is out there bull shooting us is an indication she is a DEI hire. I didn't say she was the cause of the mess the brand is in. Two brands being managed by a DEI hire is a symptom of something seriously wrong with Stellantis.
I don't think this a fair at this point, and this is why DEI is so hideous. Just because someone is female doesn't mean they not qualified or a good fit for the position.

I can tell you my daughter is one hell of an Automation engineer, and anyone assuming otherwise is sadly mistaken, so when I see this type of post I cringe.

Making her accountable for the Mess Lee, Eaton, Daimler created at Chrysler is rich. How old was she is 92'?

Making her accountable with is now obviously delays caused by fiscal freeze around the merger is richer.

And then laying any on her around RAM is simply ridiculous.

Not sure what you want her to say. Blaming your boss or the previous person at your job doesn't work that well.
 
Last edited:
Diamler Killed Chrysler, literally it was dead.... not exaggerating, Dodge also. Both were dead. I know not many people know this and it wasn't Daimler by then it was the New Yorker private equity people just to make it worse sharing that heritage name.

If not for Fiat coming in at the last hour with shock pads, they both would be on the trash heap of history with Desoto, Fargo, Imperial, Eagle, and Plymouth.

Daimler created this identity crisis with making it more Plymouth than Chrysler with the death of American Traditional Luxury.

Dodge will be fine it found it identity that isn't sub-prime.

Chrysler has to find a new Niche, or it is likely finally going to succumb to Daimlers fatal blow. It a little unfair to call the latest doctor DEI, heck, often the finer Doctors are the more empathetic gender.

"The brand is preparing to unveil its first electric vehicle (EV), a crossover, in 2026, with additional EVs planned thereafter. Feuell noted a delay in the initial rollout of Chrysler’s electric crossover, attributed to broader delays in battery-electric vehicle (BEV) launches. “The Chrysler BEV got caught up in that timing shift,” she said, but she remains confident in the vehicle’s readiness."

When you say Meaningful do you mean what you think Chrysler should be, or did you miss this?
I’ve been a Chrysler Corporation stockholder for decades in one form or another and REJECT, based on internal stockholder documentation and stockholder meeting feedback, that Daimler killed Chrysler. Far from that, as evidence to that rejection is in my garage, a Chrysler Crossfire authorized, designed and very carefully built to high standards during this era and my Dodge Challenger, still using some Mercedes designed elements from that era. To give clarity from my privileged stockholder vantage of this timeframe, it was the European stockholders that initially weakened and eventually killed this merger. If anything truly negative can be claimed, Daimler did draine the cash reserves of Chrysler during a downturn in Mercedes business, but at the outset Daimler was sharing engineering even manufacturing resources with Chrysler to vastly improve their partners product. It was elites in Europe who were appalled, furious really, that their precious and fabled German engineering was being directly infused into, what they considered, inferior American brands,
The Crossfire, and I have owned two since 2004, is totally a Mercedes Benz, built on the same assembly line, and truly an outstanding product. My roadster drop top, after 18 years is rattle and squeak free, handles and performs to European sports car standards and expectations, call it Mercedes standards. Paint, fit and finish, interior materials and comfort quality, even its top shelf radio performance is luxury through and through. That vehicle was NOT a poison pill to corrupt the Chrysler brand, it was a corporate decision to elevate the brand to the highest levels of European luxury. Looking for an affordable used Mercedes sports car, buy a Crossfire !
Blame for the failed Daimler-Chrysler marriage rests with stockholders, envious of American talent and arrogant of their German image forced this split. The stockholder meetings were insulting of America, contentious, angry, boarderline violent, leadership was outspokenly threatened with physical harm, please take my word as an American with documentation of these proceedings.
I do agree with you, Dodge is eminently capable of prospering with new product, priced appropriately and Chrysler, capturing its sacred ethos must create an identity based on affordable luxury that builds around a distinctive design signature and, I propose, a sedan, a coupe, an SUV and yes, a Crossfire reincarnation sports car that confidently touts luxury with affordability and the still present Chrysler legacy . Look at Genesis for proof of achievability that an upstart can define itself in the luxury segment and Chrysler, if any brand can, has the history to do it. Lastly, I doubt Stellantis, even with its issues, would be stupid enough to follow Daimler down that road of European hubris by squandering a brand with such potential and history. Stay the course Triple. We have no alternative.
 
When you say Meaningful do you mean what you think Chrysler should be, or did you miss this?
I guess you'd categorize it as "what I think Chrysler should be". I think EVs are a dead end. I don't think consumers want them. This vision of Chrysler's future centered on them, IMHO, will come crashing down very soon.

Even if one is a true believer in EVs, you have to wonder what that has to do with Chrysler. I don't see the point of producing an EV and putting a Chrysler badge on it.
 
Diamler Killed Chrysler, literally it was dead.... not exaggerating, Dodge also. Both were dead. I know not many people know this and it wasn't Daimler by then it was the New Yorker private equity people just to make it worse sharing that heritage name.

If not for Fiat coming in at the last hour with shock pads, they both would be on the trash heap of history with Desoto, Fargo, Imperial, Eagle, and Plymouth.

Daimler created this identity crisis with making it more Plymouth than Chrysler with the death of American Traditional Luxury.

Dodge will be fine it found it identity that isn't sub-prime.

Chrysler has to find a new Niche, or it is likely finally going to succumb to Daimlers fatal blow. It a little unfair to call the latest doctor DEI, heck, often the finer Doctors are the more empathetic gender.

"The brand is preparing to unveil its first electric vehicle (EV), a crossover, in 2026, with additional EVs planned thereafter. Feuell noted a delay in the initial rollout of Chrysler’s electric crossover, attributed to broader delays in battery-electric vehicle (BEV) launches. “The Chrysler BEV got caught up in that timing shift,” she said, but she remains confident in the vehicle’s readiness."

When you say Meaningful do you mean what you think Chrysler should be, or did you miss this?
So why else was she hired? Her extensive automotive background? Give me a break. She checked a box. She has done nothing . None of these place holder do anyway. Elkann has milked this North American money cow for close to fifteen years now and given crap back. And now it’s all coming to roost . He will move on to his next billionaire rape of some conglomerate all the while the layoff filings continue . And make no mistake, they are going to continue .
 
18 state EV are not dead, they might compete with Public transport but not dead.

If not a Tesla competitor then what? That is what is considered Luxury today,

If EVs are dead, which isn't likely 30% of the market, the future is HEV which is easy to adjust too, for Chyrsler.

Otherwise put Dodge on the Minivan and complete what Daimler started.
 
Diamler Killed Chrysler, literally it was dead.... not exaggerating, Dodge also. Both were dead. I know not many people know this and it wasn't Daimler by then it was the New Yorker private equity people just to make it worse sharing that heritage name.

If not for Fiat coming in at the last hour with shock pads, they both would be on the trash heap of history with Desoto, Fargo, Imperial, Eagle, and Plymouth.

Daimler created this identity crisis with making it more Plymouth than Chrysler with the death of American Traditional Luxury.

Dodge will be fine it found it identity that isn't sub-prime.

Chrysler has to find a new Niche, or it is likely finally going to succumb to Daimlers fatal blow. It a little unfair to call the latest doctor DEI, heck, often the finer Doctors are the more empathetic gender.

"The brand is preparing to unveil its first electric vehicle (EV), a crossover, in 2026, with additional EVs planned thereafter. Feuell noted a delay in the initial rollout of Chrysler’s electric crossover, attributed to broader delays in battery-electric vehicle (BEV) launches. “The Chrysler BEV got caught up in that timing shift,” she said, but she remains confident in the vehicle’s readiness."

When you say Meaningful do you mean what you think Chrysler should be, or did you miss this?
PSA is doing much worse than Daimler to Chrysler Group.
At least with Daimler, we got the L- and the WK platforms.

But what did PSA do to Chrysler Group since the merger?
Chrysler is down to one model since a couple of years, and it appears it would last for the unforeseen future.
Dodge is down to a single model as well, and until Charger SixPack option gets well into production, the Charger EV is just a niche product.
Wrangler appears to be heading down the same stupid electrified route, which in the real world of off roading, it will be a hindrance.
 
I’ve been a Chrysler Corporation stockholder for decades in one form or another and REJECT, based on internal stockholder documentation and stockholder meeting feedback, that Daimler killed Chrysler. Far from that, as evidence to that rejection is in my garage, a Chrysler Crossfire authorized, designed and very carefully built to high standards during this era and my Dodge Challenger, still using some Mercedes designed elements from that era. To give clarity from my privileged stockholder vantage of this timeframe, it was the European stockholders that initially weakened and eventually killed this merger. If anything truly negative can be claimed, Daimler did draine the cash reserves of Chrysler during a downturn in Mercedes business, but at the outset Daimler was sharing engineering even manufacturing resources with Chrysler to vastly improve their partners product. It was elites in Europe who were appalled, furious really, that their precious and fabled German engineering was being directly infused into, what they considered, inferior American brands,
The Crossfire, and I have owned two since 2004, is totally a Mercedes Benz, built on the same assembly line, and truly an outstanding product. My roadster drop top, after 18 years is rattle and squeak free, handles and performs to European sports car standards and expectations, call it Mercedes standards. Paint, fit and finish, interior materials and comfort quality, even its top shelf radio performance is luxury through and through. That vehicle was NOT a poison pill to corrupt the Chrysler brand, it was a corporate decision to elevate the brand to the highest levels of European luxury. Looking for an affordable used Mercedes sports car, buy a Crossfire !
Blame for the failed Daimler-Chrysler marriage rests with stockholders, envious of American talent and arrogant of their German image forced this split. The stockholder meetings were insulting of America, contentious, angry, boarderline violent, leadership was outspokenly threatened with physical harm, please take my word as an American with documentation of these proceedings.
I do agree with you, Dodge is eminently capable of prospering with new product, priced appropriately and Chrysler, capturing its sacred ethos must create an identity based on affordable luxury that builds around a distinctive design signature and, I propose, a sedan, a coupe, an SUV and yes, a Crossfire reincarnation sports car that confidently touts luxury with affordability and the still present Chrysler legacy . Look at Genesis for proof of achievability that an upstart can define itself in the luxury segment and Chrysler, if any brand can, has the history to do it. Lastly, I doubt Stellantis, even with its issues, would be stupid enough to follow Daimler down that road of European hubris by squandering a brand with such potential and history. Stay the course Triple. We have no alternative.
Bill I appreciate your insight and admire your never failing optimism. Unfortunately, I have reached the end of my road. Mopar is dead. The last vestiges will be whatever half baked ideas some Frenchie can dream up to milk another dime out of the name value of Jeep. If we see the brands, and that’s all they are now is brands kind of like cornflakes or pop tarts, survive, they will do so under different ownership - I predict Chinese. Or they may just go away. I won’t make that prediction . Either way , it’s kind of sad.
 
PSA is doing much worse than Daimler to Chrysler Group.
At least with Daimler, we got the L- and the WK platforms.

But what did PSA do to Chrysler Group since the merger?
Chrysler is down to one model since a couple of years, and it appears it would last for the unforeseen future.
Dodge is down to a single model as well, and until Charger SixPack option gets well into production, the Charger EV is just a niche product.
Wrangler appears to be heading down the same stupid electrified route, which in the real world of off roading, it will be a hindrance.
WELL AH NO the L platform was not Daimlers, it was nearly complete when they rode in, yes they raided the parts bin, but NO it wasn't E-segment cars. Even mention this to some of the Engineers at the time and your likely to get your rear kicked.

And while sort of Like the WK after 13 years we forget about how unhappy Jeep people were with it at the time and the amount Jeep had to help fix it.

Since, Daimler literally killed the company they have LOOONNNG way to go.... If you want to go over the EV thing again, we, can it is regulatory, HEVs are actually kind of awesome.
 
Or it could be they discontinued the hemi and nobody want a 6 cylinder that can’t tow anything, because the gas mileage is horrible if you are towing anything and a hybrid is not worth a **** either. And electric is for the huggers working people need a gas that can go constantly and not let Biden ruin this country.
 
Back
Top