What's new
Mopar Insiders Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

All-New 2026 Jeep® Cherokee (KM) Prepares for Debut Late 2025

All-New 2026 Jeep® Cherokee (KM) Prepares for Debut Late 2025​

Jeep’s First-Ever North American Hybrid-Only SUV Breaks Cover This Year​


1748545343647.png

Jeep® fans, the wait is almost over. The all-new 2026 Jeep Cherokee (KM) is on its way, and it’s bringing a big change with it: it’s going hybrid-only. That’s right—this will be the first North American Jeep vehicle offered exclusively with a hybrid powertrain. No gas-only or plug-in (PHEV) options—just one smart, fuel-saving setup built for adventure.

 
If it’s hybrid only I’m not biting yet. Perhaps there is a Pentastar V-6 lurking. Ten years in two wonderful current generation Cherokees has me sold on this Jeep, but I’m just not there on a hybrid. I’ll test one for sure but is there any chance us old school gas engine guys get something, you know, old school?
 
I was looking forward to buying it, but now after seeing what engine is in it I will not buy. It will sell for people who are looking for efficiency and the new upgrades but not towing or heavy driving. That tiny displacement will fail under stress just give it time. If they would have put a meatier say, 2.7L that has some meat to the casing to withstand extra pressure then it would be worth it. 1.6L for the prices is ridiculous.
 
I gotta figure the 2L engine price will be lower...right? Less complexity than the hybrid. This is weird - I get they want this to be a hybrid, but shouldn't the hybrid be a trim/branding unto itself (4xG = Gas, 4xH - H = hybrid, 4xPHEV = Plugin Hybrid, 4xEV = Pure EV, 4xREEV = Range Extended Hybrid), so you can carve out pricing/feature differences?

It's almost like Carlos bet on the wrong horse in the 2024 US Presidential election 😂
 
KM is STLA Large. So is WL74/WL75, which will get the the 2.0 GME EVO for 2026.

2.0 GME EVO will fit in KM.
Of course it CAN. But Stellantis WON'T. That's the comprehension here. 2.0 GME EVO will probably be 300 hp+ and 325 lb-ft of torque+, get a clue. 2.0 GME EVO replaces the Pentastar. The vans, the Ram Dakota, Wrangler/Gladiator, and Grand Cherokee will all get the 2.0 GME EVO. The Hornet/Compass replacements will not get the 2.0 GME EVO, nor will this new "Cherokee". You got to pay attention to the world man, 2.0 liters is quickly becoming 300hp territory these days. Going forward FWD won't even have 2.0 liter I4s unless they are large odball vehicles like vans. You're not going to see some 300 hp, 325 lb-ft 2.0T I4 GME EVO 9 speed auto Cherokee, so get that out your head...
 
T
I am going to guess most ..... Most people will be fine with it given the price.

But I agree as a Upgrade the 1.3 and e-axle that is in my Tonale would be a great upgrade. Or even the Punch with a E-axle
Jeep is a brand that for a long time was synonymous with the Inline-6 engine. Would it be so difficult to imagine a fleet of naturally aspirated inline-6 engines making their way into alot of the brand's mainstream vehicles? Probably not. Something to the tune of about 310hp and maybe even 325lb-ft of torque. That's more than enough for a vehicle like the Cherokee, the Grand Cherokee, the Wrangler and even the Gladiator as an entry level powertrain. A Hurricane S/O would be a step up, offering 420hp/468lb-ft of torque which would be an awesome powertrain option for all of these vehicles while the Wrangler and Gladiator could go a step further with the 470hp 6.4L Hemi V8.
You do realize that the 2.0 GME EVO turbocharged I4 that is forthcoming will be your 300 hp, 325 lb-ft base engine for medium vehicles going forward, right?
 
I was looking forward to buying it, but now after seeing what engine is in it I will not buy. It will sell for people who are looking for efficiency and the new upgrades but not towing or heavy driving. That tiny displacement will fail under stress just give it time. If they would have put a meatier say, 2.7L that has some meat to the casing to withstand extra pressure then it would be worth it. 1.6L for the prices is ridiculous.
You people and your unrealistic powertrain fantasies, smh. How are y'all Mopar fans on a Mopar website and you don't even realize all of the available powertrains in the Mopar portfolio, let alone market competition? There are only really three engine options that could work with this so called Cherokee (if you look at the direction Stellantis is going). Those options are the GSE Firefly 1.3T I4, the leftover Peugeot Prince 1.6T I4 (which it got), and the GME TORNADO EVO 2.0T I4. The Pentastar is on its way out, so don't even ask. The Tornado EVO will end up with 300 hp+, 325 lb-ft+. Because of that, a FWD car with that engine would seem sporty and upmarket, not the Cherokee's market. The real question for me is; why did Stellantis not use the GSE Firefly for the Cherokee? The Prince was Peugeot's FIAT 1.4T I4 FIRE engine. FCA worked hard on the GSE to replace multiple different outdated I4 engine families (including the FIRE), and even a V twin engine. So why use an outdated engine design? The GSE is superior to the Prince, making the same power with less displacement. This Prince engine being sold in the U.S. has Tavares written all over it. No one asked for this crap.
 
I gotta figure the 2L engine price will be lower...right? Less complexity than the hybrid. This is weird - I get they want this to be a hybrid, but shouldn't the hybrid be a trim/branding unto itself (4xG = Gas, 4xH - H = hybrid, 4xPHEV = Plugin Hybrid, 4xEV = Pure EV, 4xREEV = Range Extended Hybrid), so you can carve out pricing/feature differences?

It's almost like Carlos bet on the wrong horse in the 2024 US Presidential election 😂
What makes you think a 300 hp, 325 lb-ft 2.0T I4 will show up in a frumpy fwd car meant for fuel economy? What it needs is a 1.5T I4 version of the 1.3T I4. The 1.3 already makes the same power as the 1.6, so a 1.5 version of 1.3 would be around 200 hp, 250 lb-ft. That's all this market gets nowadays, thanks to flat torque curves and multiple extra transmission ratios...
 
Back
Top