fbpx
StellantisUAW
Trending

UAW Considers Strike Vote Against Stellantis Over Contract Dispute

UAW Plans Strike Vote, Citing Stellantis Contract Violations...

The United Auto Workers (UAW) union, led by President Shawn Fain, announced plans to hold strike authorization votes against Stellantis due to the automaker allegedly failing to uphold certain promises made in the 2023 UAW Collective Bargaining Agreement. The announcement comes just months after the conclusion of a six-week strike that secured new agreements with Stellantis, General Motors (GM), and Ford.

During a livestreamed speech on Tuesday evening, Fain emphasized the union’s readiness to take action if necessary, stating, “We are 100% within our rights and within our power to take strike action if necessary.” He added that the union would be “holding strike authorization votes at one or more Stellantis locals. And we will stand united to enforce our contract and save American jobs.”

Why the Strike Vote? –

The Promises From Stellantis on the 2023 UAW Collective Bargaining Agreement. (UAW).

Strike authorization votes are common when a union is approaching the end of a contract and is beginning negotiations for a new one. However, in this case, the UAW is looking to strike mid-contract due to what Fain describes as Stellantis’ failure to live up to commitments made in the 2023 agreement. The 2023 deal allowed the union to strike during the contract period if there were violations related to job protections, such as plant closings.

This marks a significant shift from past agreements, where the UAW typically agreed not to strike during the life of a contract. Fain’s comments suggest that Stellantis has not fulfilled promises regarding job security and other key issues, although the specific violations were not detailed.

“We are prepared to take strike action to make Stellantis keep the promise,” Fain said during his speech.

Potential Impact on Stellantis –

Stellantis, which manufactures vehicles under the Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep®, and Ram brands in North America, employs approximately 43,000 UAW members across 19 manufacturing facilities. Although not all locals are expected to participate in strike authorization votes, even a limited strike could disrupt operations at other Stellantis facilities.

However, some industry observers believe that a strike may not have the immediate impact the UAW hopes for. Stellantis currently has high inventory levels at its dealerships, meaning that a temporary halt in production might not lead to the immediate shortages that strikes typically cause.

Stellantis’ Response –

Stellantis sign in front of Auburn Hills Headquarters. (MoparInsiders).

Stellantis has not yet provided an official response to Fain’s statement. However, when asked earlier in the week about an unrelated unfair labor practice charge, the company stated that it had not violated any commitments made in the 2023 UAW collective bargaining agreement. The automaker noted that it had not yet seen the specific complaint from the UAW.

While the timing and extent of any potential strike remain uncertain, the UAW is clearly signaling its determination to hold Stellantis accountable to the terms of the contract negotiated last year. For now, all eyes are on the upcoming strike authorization votes and the possible ramifications for both workers and the automaker’s operations across North America.

Robert S. Miller

Robert S. Miller is a diehard Mopar enthusiast who lives and breathes all that is Mopar. The Michigander is not only the Editor for MoparInsiders.com, 5thGenRams.com, and HDRams.com but an automotive photographer. He is an avid fan of offshore powerboat racing, which he travels the country to take part in.

Related Articles

Loading new replies...

Sounds like a factory readiness issue. The new Durango is starting production in 2025 or 2026, and the Alfa is coming in 2027, the same year as the next Grand Cherokee. Windsor is already set up to build STLA Large vehicles (Charger), while Detroit may need some retooling?

Capacity-wise, the Alfa could likely be produced at either plant, since they are anticipating building only 20k a year once production ramps up in 2028.Screenshot_20240621_093006_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20240618_082947_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20240613_114306_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

Reply Like

Stellantis Shifting Durango Production For Alfa Romeo SUV?​

Alfa Romeo EV SUV To Be Built At JNAP As Durango Moves To Windsor?​

View attachment 10043

Stellantis is making notable shifts in its production plans, with recent reports highlighting changes for both the Dodge Durango and a new Alfa Romeo electric SUV. While a leaked document from CocheSpias in May states the production of an all-electric Alfa Romeo E-segment SUV (codenamed A6U) at the Jefferson North Assembly Plant (JNAP), the Windsor Starhas reported that the next-generation Dodge Durango (codenamed D6U) will be moving to the Windsor Assembly Plant in Ontario.

Currently Durango may be older yet sells about the same as GM's hyped Blazer which is amazing. Makes me wonder how long current Durango could keep going? Dodge buyers don't seem enamoured by new platforms or care about how long it's been since latest refresh. Durango is a classic design borrowed from Magnum. Hoping Stellantis maintains the basics and simply evolves the concept.

Reply Like

click to expand...

Well that fancy quad exhaust definitely means the Alfa Romeo SUV wouldn't be an EV, that's for sure. The more I think of it though, If the other Stellantis brands had a larger presence over here, would it be enough to balance out the carbon footprint for them to continue producing our beloved Mopar brands in a way that would please the current customer base (with hurricane engines, not v8s). Take Fiat, Alfa Romeo and Maserati for instance, Fiat and Alfa are known for small engines and things like that. Use them in the North American Market to do battle with the Japanese and Korea vehicles and the onslaught of the electric market. I see no reason why a good 85% of those vehicles can't be put on the STLA Medium platform with hybrid powertrains with Hurricane-4 engines up front with the E-DCT gearbox driving the from wheels and a powerful STLA Medium EDM powering the rear wheels, taking on cars like the Civic Type R, Integra Type S, TLX Type S, MDX Type S, Elantra N, Toyota's entire GR lineup and sold as Fiat Abarth cars. Do the same with Alfa Romeo & Maserati and make some Quadrifoglio & Trofeo vehicles to battle it out with the 4-series and smaller BMW M cars and some of the AMG Mercedes vehicles. All of it would be electrified because they would have the EDMs in the back and the hybrid E-DCT gearboxes up front but they'd also have the 2.0L Hurricane-4 Turbo as well. Let those cars flood the market and displace Toyota, Honda and Nissan, let the Chrysler brand do all of the full BEV models, let Jeep be an off road brand again, Ram will always be Ram and let Dodge rule the roads again with Hurricane-6 powertrains with massive amounts of horsepower and torque! Maybe even bring back the cubic inch displacement of the Australian Hemi-6 engines in 3.5L, 4.0L & 4.3L with Hurricane twin turbo technology and performance and a hybrid 8-speed Gen-4. Let the Mopar brands be exclusively run on the STLA Large and STLA frame platforms. Heck, let Chrysler be all electric and come out with decent cars, we may even see the end of Tesla, which would be amazing!

Reply Like

click to expand...

To be successful a global automobile company has to be global. Alfa Romeo is losing its pure Italian status just as Jeep is losing its pure American status. What will remain for any Stellantis brand is unique styling imagery that will be based around historic design elements that could be done in the native countries but built elsewhere in the most cost effective way, with each site replicating the manufacturing system and process. You will have multiple brands sharing the same factory and only one brand would be domestic, maybe none. You could have Jeeps, Fiats, Peugeot’s and Alfa Romeos all built in the same factory, sharing a common architecture that focuses on a market that targets the same customer base generally, but a different brand identity to match the.targeted market. A kind of slight of hand to maximize build quality and profits. Look for your next Jeep to be built in Poland sitting next to one built in Toledo Ohio that all have the iconic Jeep seven slot grill and the buyer sees a Jeep in both, superficially an “.All-American” Icon that few will dig any deeper into its origin. Now you see it, now you don’t ! It’s magic!! Welcome to the 21st century folks.

Reply Like

click to expand...

Well that fancy quad exhaust definitely means the Alfa Romeo SUV wouldn't be an EV, that's for sure. The more I think of it though, If the other Stellantis brands had a larger presence over here, would it be enough to balance out the carbon footprint for them to continue producing our beloved Mopar brands in a way that would please the current customer base (with hurricane engines, not v8s). Take Fiat, Alfa Romeo and Maserati for instance, Fiat and Alfa are known for small engines and things like that. Use them in the North American Market to do battle with the Japanese and Korea vehicles and the onslaught of the electric market. I see no reason why a good 85% of those vehicles can't be put on the STLA Medium platform with hybrid powertrains with Hurricane-4 engines up front with the E-DCT gearbox driving the from wheels and a powerful STLA Medium EDM powering the rear wheels, taking on cars like the Civic Type R, Integra Type S, TLX Type S, MDX Type S, Elantra N, Toyota's entire GR lineup and sold as Fiat Abarth cars. Do the same with Alfa Romeo & Maserati and make some Quadrifoglio & Trofeo vehicles to battle it out with the 4-series and smaller BMW M cars and some of the AMG Mercedes vehicles. All of it would be electrified because they would have the EDMs in the back and the hybrid E-DCT gearboxes up front but they'd also have the 2.0L Hurricane-4 Turbo as well. Let those cars flood the market and displace Toyota, Honda and Nissan, let the Chrysler brand do all of the full BEV models, let Jeep be an off road brand again, Ram will always be Ram and let Dodge rule the roads again with Hurricane-6 powertrains with massive amounts of horsepower and torque! Maybe even bring back the cubic inch displacement of the Australian Hemi-6 engines in 3.5L, 4.0L & 4.3L with Hurricane twin turbo technology and performance and a hybrid 8-speed Gen-4. Let the Mopar brands be exclusively run on the STLA Large and STLA frame platforms. Heck, let Chrysler be all electric and come out with decent cars, we may even see the end of Tesla, which would be amazing!

Of all the traditional domestic Mopar brands, Chrysler might be the only one that could be successful as an all electric marquee. Chrysler, let’s face it, is essentially gone, but the image of Chrysler’s past still endures. Why not be a direct Tesla competitor, why not reinvent itself that way since little else is left besides its image to clutter up the brands portfolio and its defined market target on the showroom floor. It’s smart and really intelligent for all the other brands to make room in its brand composition, essentially and necessarily an ICE dominated brand for an electric model. But Chrysler, the new Chrysler, can be redefined and really, really, go after Tesla. That how I would approach it.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

Back to top button