SPOTTED: 2026 Dodge Charger SIXPACK H/O Two-Door

Dodge fans have something big to look forward to this summer—and it’s not just electric. A 2026 Dodge Charger SIXPACK H/O prototype has been spotted quietly resting in a suburban Ontario driveway, packing heat in all the right ways.

Snapped by Vlad Simiganoschi (@vladsimig), the mysterious two-door coupe was decked out in menacing Diamond Black paint, looking like it rolled right off a Fast & Furious movie set.

Unlike the electric Charger Daytona that’s been making headlines, this beast is powered by Dodge’s new twin-turbo 3.0-liter HURRICANE High-Output (H/O) I6, which cranks out 550 horsepower and 521 lb-ft of torque. That’s more than the old 392 HEMI, and it’s paired to a new 8-speed 880RE automatic transmission. Better yet, this one sends power to all four wheels—yes, it’s AWD and ready for year-round performance.

Visually, the SIXPACK H/O looks the part. It sports an aggressive mail-slot grille, a power dome hood with a large “SIXPACK” heat extractor, and a no-nonsense dual exhaust setup. Big 20-inch wheels wrapped in sticky performance tires and 6-piston red Brembo® calipers give it a track-ready stance even when parked.

This isn’t just a car—it’s a statement. Dodge is doubling down on its muscle car roots, giving ICE fans a serious reason to celebrate even as the industry moves full-speed into EV territory. With HEMI V8s temporarily retired, the HURRICANE six is now taking the lead, offering more power and better efficiency in a new-age muscle package.

The new Charger SIXPACK production is expected to begin later this month at the Windsor Assembly Plant in Ontario, Canada, with a full reveal expected later this summer. So if you hear a turbocharged growl rolling through your neighborhood soon, don’t be surprised—it just might be Dodge’s new ICE king lurking nearby.

Editorial Change: This article has been updated to reflect that the individual who granted us permission to use the photos was not the original photographer. We regret the oversight and have corrected the attribution accordingly. It was also noted that the images were taken in Ontario, not Michigan.