UN4GTBL
Moderator
- Joined
- May 7, 2018
- Messages
- 1,158
- Reaction score
- 555
- Points
- 113
Is it based on Stelvio? If it is some things may be expected. For example track witdh. AFAIK Stelvio (949/GU) is almost an inch wider than WK2. I presume that WL will be even wider than Stelvio.
Wheelbase? WK2 has a short wheelbase for an E segment SUV. Its "twin" GLE has grown a lot. So we can expect that Grand Cherokee will grow by at least 2 inches.
Doesn't the current models offer diesel?Some cars or someone would say SUVs for which Gen III V6 diesel was or is under development. WL is in that list.
- Mechanical Design Engineer
April 2015 – March 2018 3 years
Cento (FE)
Resident Design Engineer at VM MOTORI FCA (Fiat Chrysler Automobiles)
Department: Engineering BEC (Base Engine Components (engine block, crankshaft, connecting rod, piston))
Principali progetti:
- supporto migrazione dal sistema cad Catia V5 a Siemens NX
- engine block V6 JL Gen3
- engine block V6 DT Gen3
- engine Block V6 E-UV Gen3 (Alfa Romeo project 964, Jeep WL)
- update engine Block V6 Gen2
- study layout V6 Twin Turbo
Old diesel is a Gen 2. This new version is a Gen 3. A lot has changed. Even maximum torque on paper, 14% more and now it peaks already at 1600 rpm in comparison to 2000 rpm for old one.
In Europe Grand Cherokee version or Jeep version is rated at 190 and 250 HP. There is a Maserati version with 275 HP but its turbo has a ceramic ball bearing.
In my opinion 190 HP version could be replaced by an all aluminium 2.2 liter diesel which is already in use by Alfa and Wrangler. It goes up to 210 HP for Alfa and 200 HP for Wrangler. Torque is not an issue for 2.2. Wrangler version has 450 Nm (332 lb ft) at 2000 rpm while Alfa has 470 Nm (347 lb ft) at 1750 rpm. 3.0 with 190 HP has 440 Nm (325 ft lb) at 1600 rpm.
The most important is that 2.2 weighs at least 80 kilos (176 lbs) if not up to 100 (220 lbs) less than 3.0 V6.
This class of vehicle in Europe is mostly sold as a diesel or a some form of hybrid.
So your proposing that the New Grand Cherokee and Wagoneer are sharing design points to themselves and its a whole new design??New Code folks.... anyone want to bet the build points are not in common with either of the current Alfa models?
So your proposing that the New Grand Cherokee and Wagoneer are sharing design points to themselves and its a whole new design??
Thanks thats interesting for all the hype that has been going on for awhile. I looked and drove the Stelvio Quad and didn't think it was remotely as big as the current Grand Cherokee Trackhawk I have.No sharing opportunity does not mean same build points, systems and components. I saying it not G platform mate like the Stelvio.
Thanks thats interesting for all the hype that has been going on for awhile. I looked and drove the Stelvio Quad and didn't think it was remotely as big as the current Grand Cherokee Trackhawk I have.
Little bird says GG platform a Global E sized build points. Architecture vs Platform thing still crosses people up. We already know the G platform is too small for E segment cars and something new was developed. Common build points are smart business as long as they do not compromise the integrity and performance of the vehicle. Be interesting to see how close it is too the existing Brampton build points... just sayin. So much for narrative that the Alfa experiments were a waste of money. Been saying for years down stream vehicle will benefit, even the Pacifica did. Now some high volume with direct benefit will be hitting the show room. People are so impatient