yeah, punitive solutions are always the most effective right? /s
I also have a bone to pick with your characterization of BEVs as being government driven. When you factor in all the tax rebates given to petroleum industry as well as all the healthcare and environmental costs associated with the burning of gas/diesel that are picked up by society (government) as a whole, its clear to me that EVs are getting the short stick when it comes to owner incentives. At the same time, you really can't tell me that (regardless of what you think of their product) Tesla isn't effectively marketing its products to an eager population.
My wife is no hippy by any means, but she's interested in buying a Leaf, cause she thinks they're cool looking. The electric thing is a fringe benefit as far as shes concerned. I'm the one that's chomping at the bit for a BEV truck.
I'm not a fan of subsidies in either direction, especially considering organizations whose profits are measured in billions, but that is a "Tu Coque" (you too) fallacy. I'm not defending petro company subsidies - get rid of them. Use profits to fund exploration.
As far as "environmental costs" go - show me your research and I will show you mine. My research comes from multiple highly respect PhDs from some of the world's most pre-eminent positions at some of the most prestigious universities and organizations on the globe. I don't cite journalists and their opinions, nor political organizations and their deceit, but scientists and their data.
As far as Tesla goes. Are they profitable? No. Heavily subsidized, they sell green credits to other manufacturers, yet are still struggling financially. I don't doubt there are people who favor them, but they are very much the minority. It reminds me of many sci-fi shows that get cancelled. The fans are passionate enthusiastic followers of certain shows, but there just aren't enough people watching the show in general to justify keeping it on the air.
I do not oppose researching, developing, producing, and selling electrified vehicles. I draw the line where I see arbitrary government mandates meddling with market dynamics based on false information and assumptions that have been empirically proven false. I also oppose legislation punishing organizations for choices their customers make (like charging FCA hundreds of billions in Europe and $77 million in the U.S. because even though they offer CAFE compliant vehicles their customers instead bought trucks and SUVs - as if they have the ability to channel customers into what they want them to buy). Ultimately, it is the consumer's choice - as it should be. If they want to punish someone, punish the purchaser (which will cause an uproar that would ultimately lead to a repeal of the policies - but they know that, which is why they punish the manufacturers).