Mopar Insiders Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

GME-T6 Confirmed to be built in Mexico?

Tony K

Active member
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Messages
155
Reaction score
141
That was yesterday. Apparently, this wasn't ready for prime time. Today, it's gone. Perhaps a victim of the chip shortage.
1640725570394.png
 

ChargerFan1

Active member
Joined
Jul 10, 2021
Messages
244
Reaction score
149
That’s not accurate, and EV won’t be no where near majority of the Company production well into 2030’s.
And STLA Large is Giorgio.
We can split hairs all day, but they're going all in on EV starting in 2024. Further, slapping a battery in a gas chassis is not how you do it, the cars are compromised in many ways (quoting Gilles). These are designed for BEV and BEV only to take the advantages of design where ice holds them back. Sure STLA LG may share some non effecting dimensions with Giorgio, but it aint Giorgio and never was.
 

Attachments

  • Stellantis-EV-Day-STLA-platform-11-1200x675.jpg
    Stellantis-EV-Day-STLA-platform-11-1200x675.jpg
    68 KB · Views: 5
  • STLA-Large.jpg
    STLA-Large.jpg
    83.5 KB · Views: 5

AlexB

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2018
Messages
1,998
Reaction score
1,329
We can split hairs all day, but they're going all in on EV starting in 2024. Further, slapping a battery in a gas chassis is not how you do it, the cars are compromised in many ways (quoting Gilles). These are designed for BEV and BEV only to take the advantages of design where ice holds them back. Sure STLA LG may share some non effecting dimensions with Giorgio, but it aint Giorgio and never was.
Actually you should watch the Electric Day presentation, Company made clear the flexibility of having multiple powertrains.
In fact the company use the term “Low Emission Vehicle= LEV.

You perception is NOT SUPPORTED BY STELLANTIS MATH…(North America 38%/40% LEV by 2030 ).
 
Last edited:

ChargerFan1

Active member
Joined
Jul 10, 2021
Messages
244
Reaction score
149
I’m kind surprise at folks who think Stellantis is being very Aggressive with BEV, and others who believe Stellantis is playing “catch up “ to VW/Ford/Tesla/GM etc……
Electric Whiplasho_O
Lol 36 billion is all the cards, you don't think that is aggressive? Do you also think they'll pop another 2 billion crash testing the ram, grand cherokee, grand cherokee L, wrangler, gladiator, durango, charger, challenger, 300 - for 1 year. C'mon man. I know you are portfolio heavy with this stock, but - I'd diversify. I loved Marchionne as he produced, I have yet to see anything from Carlos aside from that major bet, but it wont have any affect on your stocks.

Everyone is going full EV and has shown multiple concepts. Stellantis has shown nothing but a concept Chrysler egg car (the worst brand) from the FCA days. They better get their act together ..AND FAST.
 
Last edited:

AlexB

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2018
Messages
1,998
Reaction score
1,329
Lol 36 billion is all the cards, you don't think that is aggressive? Do you also think they'll pop another 2 billion crash testing the ram, grand cherokee, grand cherokee L, wrangler, gladiator, durango, charger, challenger, 300 - for 1 year. C'mon man. I know you are portfolio heavy with this stock, but - I'd diversify. I loved Marchionne as he produced, I have yet to see anything from Carlos aside from that major bet, but it wont have any affect on your stocks.

Everyone is going full EV and has shown multiple concepts. Stellantis has shown nothing but a concept Chrysler egg car (the worst brand) from the FCA days. They better get their act together ..AND FAST.
If you think it cost $2 billion to crash test, then I hope you hire somebody else to manage your own finances.

Second, the United States will be slower (vs E.U.)with accepting EV’a outside large metro areas and coastal states.

Concepts are not production & execution: Hence the Chevy Bolt being a flop.
 
Last edited:

ChargerFan1

Active member
Joined
Jul 10, 2021
Messages
244
Reaction score
149
If you think it cost $2 billion to crash test, then I hope you hire somebody else to manage your own finances.

Second, the United States will be slower (vs E.U.)with accepting EV’a outside large metro areas and coastal states.

Concepts are not production & execution: Hence the Chevy Bolt being a flop.
Any major structural change in an automobile requires re-crash testing and certification, to do every RWD vehicle will cost 2 bill all day long - and for that reason, IMO, it aint happening with an all in bet on EV's starting in 2 years.

My stocks are doing fine btw, up 54% - now when my crypto takes off maybe, just maybe I can afford this crazy new 2024 Charger with over 1000hp because it'll be north of 120K
 

AlexB

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2018
Messages
1,998
Reaction score
1,329
Any major structural change in an automobile requires re-crash testing and certification, to do every RWD vehicle will cost 2 bill all day long - and for that reason, IMO, it aint happening with an all in bet on EV's starting in 2 years.

My stocks are doing fine btw, up 54% - now when my crypto takes off maybe, just maybe I can afford this crazy new 2024 Charger with over 1000hp because it'll be north of 120K
If you think Wrangler 4Xe and Grand Wagoneer EV(2025 MY) cost $2 billion each , then you need to stop drinking.

38%-40% (LEV = PHEV+BEV) by 2030 sales mix in North America is NOT ALL IN BY any measure.
 

radiogoon

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If you think Wrangler 4Xe and Grand Wagoneer EV(2025 MY) cost $2 billion each , then you need to stop drinking.

38%-40% (LEV = PHEV+BEV) by 2030 sales mix in North America is NOT ALL IN BY any measure.
to do every RWD vehicle will cost 2 bill all day long...
 

AlexB

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2018
Messages
1,998
Reaction score
1,329
to do every RWD vehicle will cost 2 bill all day long...
Stellantis doesn’t make every RWD vehicle
Please read the thread: That’s not what that poster misunderstanding was about.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top